Page 1 of 1

Why is this Heartland Rev. 2.0?

Posted: 15 Jul 2003, 13:42
by MrChris
What was Heartland Rev. 1.0?

Err, that's it, really... :roll:

Posted: 15 Jul 2003, 13:54
by Quiff Boy
:D

"heartland rev 1.0" (or just "heartland" as it was known) was this forum's first incarnation.

it used an old version of the phpbb bulletin board software - phpbb v1.4.4 - which had less features and wasn't as flexible or as friendly to use (or as easy to admin!)

it even lived at a temporary address for a while too, until i had decided that it was going to take off and was worth carrying on with...

http://heartland.dc-hosting.net/

when i moved to this permanent URL and subsequently upgraded the forum software (just over a year ago - the upgrade took place april 2002 i seem to recall. the move a little earlier than this) it felt like a revision of the version number was the right thing to do... just call me an I.T. geek :urff:

in much the same way the "shot rev2.0" videos took the first version and added to it, "heartland rev 2.0" represented a bigger, faster, friendlier and way more powerful forum experience - and it came in a selection of very pretty (and probably very cruel) colours... even though most of you still use the red & white scheme :roll: ;)

:)

Posted: 15 Jul 2003, 14:30
by Quiff Boy
heartland rev 1.0:
http://web.archive.org/web/200202131114 ... sting.net/

aww, innit cute? :D

Posted: 15 Jul 2003, 14:41
by hallucienate
I'm getting a bit nostalgic, those were the days before I started posting.

Posted: 15 Jul 2003, 14:56
by MrChris
Aaah, that was lovely. A bit like being huddled around the old wireless. I'm glad I asked now.

Posted: 15 Jul 2003, 16:29
by paint it black
Ah, memory lane :D

12 users logged on at anyo one time.......and 10 of them Lars :lol: :lol: :lol:

.......and only 3-6 posts a day to wade through :wink:

Posted: 15 Jul 2003, 17:26
by Chairman Bux
Before my time, that one I'm afraid. Looks "cute" though.

Posted: 15 Jul 2003, 17:40
by Debaser
My my! I'd forgotton how cute it was.

Newest registered member was J.j.......how time flies

Debaser

Posted: 15 Jul 2003, 18:33
by Andy TG
Quiff Boy wrote:heartland rev 1.0:
http://web.archive.org/web/200202131114 ... sting.net/

aww, innit cute? :D
Not the bloody "Baby Photos" Please - Is it that time already ;-)

Posted: 15 Jul 2003, 18:51
by Quiff Boy
paint it black wrote:12 users logged on at anyo one time.......and 10 of them Lars :lol: :lol: :lol:
i remember that :urff: :D :D :D :D

Posted: 15 Jul 2003, 18:53
by Lars Svensson
Them were t'days...
It wa' all fields round here then...

:innocent: ;D

Posted: 15 Jul 2003, 19:13
by hallucienate
and how we laughed when Methy lost 400 posts :innocent:

Posted: 15 Jul 2003, 19:14
by hallucienate
BTW Lars, nice sig :notworthy:

It's always been one of my favourite Smiths lyrics.

Posted: 15 Jul 2003, 20:01
by Lars Svensson
hallucienate wrote:BTW Lars, nice sig :notworthy:

It's always been one of my favourite Smiths lyrics.
Ta Hallucienate!

I have to admit it's taken me years and years to finally discover them for the joy (if that's the right word!) they are!! but I'm getting there... ;D :notworthy:

Posted: 15 Jul 2003, 20:04
by Quiff Boy
Lars Svensson wrote:
hallucienate wrote:BTW Lars, nice sig :notworthy:

It's always been one of my favourite Smiths lyrics.
Ta Hallucienate!

I have to admit it's taken me years and years to finally discover them for the joy (if that's the right word!) they are!! but I'm getting there... ;D :notworthy:
but what about the jangly bits? ;)

:innocent:

Posted: 15 Jul 2003, 20:36
by Lars Svensson
ahem...they still jangle... :?

HOWEVER! :roll: I think that my former criticism may have been a little unfounded...

I'm sure I can find it in my heart to accomodate said jangle... :lol: :innocent:

Posted: 15 Jul 2003, 21:27
by Andie
Quiff Boy wrote:heartland rev 1.0:
http://web.archive.org/web/200202131114 ... sting.net/

aww, innit cute? :D

damn...although i never posted there...i remember lurking...i think i first found out about the shows in 2001 on that message board...i could be wrong though...i usually am... :roll: :wink: