Page 1 of 1

Apocalypse now (or maybe next week)

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 10:14
by paint it black
Mother Russia attacked by meteors = Wow!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-21468116

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 10:15
by markfiend
Tunguska 2?

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 11:06
by Pista
Where's Bruce Willis when you really need him?

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 11:59
by iesus
Impressive videos in youtube with the meteorites...
In fact reality is far more impressive than hollywood movies in such things :roll:

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 13:09
by markfiend
According to stuff I've read, this was all caused by a meteor about a metre across. Imagine the destruction caused by a big impact!

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 13:30
by iesus
According to military sites the object was larger and was hit by Moscow's Air defence S-400 missile or something similar.
There is a video with the traces of the meteor and the missile collision tracks in http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... sNPIyxwPlE :eek:

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 14:26
by Pista
If that's right, that's some pretty good shooting.
:eek:

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 15:01
by markfiend
iesus wrote:According to military sites the object was larger and was hit by Moscow's Air defence S-400 missile or something similar.
There is a video with the traces of the meteor and the missile collision tracks in http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... sNPIyxwPlE :eek:
I call bull. No way will anyone hit a meteor travelling at 8km/s with anything.

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 15:05
by markfiend

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 15:10
by sultan2075
markfiend wrote:
iesus wrote:According to military sites the object was larger and was hit by Moscow's Air defence S-400 missile or something similar.
There is a video with the traces of the meteor and the missile collision tracks in http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... sNPIyxwPlE :eek:
I call bull. No way will anyone hit a meteor travelling at 8km/s with anything.
Why not? It seems (to my liberal-arts educated self) to be technically feasible: trajectory and speed can give you a location at a given point. I guess maybe you're suggesting that it's simply moving too fast for such action to be taken?

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 15:16
by iesus
Sultan2075 is correct, it is technically possible to locate that kind of objects with the current means and destroy it before it hits the surface of the planet.

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 15:28
by markfiend
It was a small object (maybe 1 or 2 metres across) coming in out of the sunrise at MACH 25. The "explosion" heard on the videos is a sonic boom (which is what caused the damage; hypersonic shockwaves are what knocked over all the trees at the Tunguska impact) but probably several km high, beyond the range of any surface-to-air missile. By the time anyone had seen the meteor coming, it had probably already disintegrated.

*Edit to add: and I'm not seeing any missile vapour-trails in that (or any other) video...

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 15:45
by Pista
As a famous man once said, " It's not impossible. I used to bullseye womp rats in my T-16 back home, they're not much bigger than two meters."
:innocent:

Seriously though, I'd say it's technically possible, but would still be a bl00dy good shot to bring something that small down at that speed.

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 15:48
by markfiend
Yeah, especially when it was travelling at five times the speed of the surface-to-air missile it was supposedly hit by.

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 16:08
by Pista
Yeah, well there is that.
Unless they were in front of it.

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 16:12
by christophe
if the object was discovered soon enough, I am sure a trajectory could have been made and a rocket could have been fired towards it, before it entered the atmosphere.
just aiming and shooting like some sites claimed is too ridiculous for words :lol:

apparently even the army is denying it now.


I'm not saying this is no tragedy but all things considered I think this could have been a lot worse.

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 16:13
by christophe
Pista wrote:Yeah, well there is that.
Unless they were in front of it.
I think it EVERYTHING was in front of it until a sew seconds before 'impact' :wink:

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 17:43
by nowayjose
iesus wrote:According to military sites the object was larger and was hit by Moscow's Air defence S-400 missile or something similar.
You mean, like:

Image

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 18:24
by Pista
:lol: :lol:

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 18:36
by iesus
Not a bad idea :lol: :lol:
I suspect WWF, Greenpeace etc.. will turn off the project of mass usage of birds for that kind of purposes :innocent:
Also the army officers denied that they used air-to-air missiles. :wink:
They didn't say anything about ground-to-air toys :lol:

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 19:38
by Bartek
I thought that at least here i can get away from that, even that i spent half of day offline and with no tv or radio (faking polish news channels keep talking about that all day since 7 a.m.).

Posted: 18 Feb 2013, 10:06
by markfiend
Apparently it was bigger than was first thought. About 15 metres across. It exploded about 100km up, and it seems that some pieces came to earth.

Posted: 18 Feb 2013, 11:26
by Pista
I read that too. & now there seems to be a spate of "fireball in the sky" sightings all over the place

Posted: 21 Feb 2013, 10:54
by Pista
We're not saying it was aliens............but it was aliens

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... XdJ7wm4Opk

:eek:

Posted: 21 Feb 2013, 11:41
by iesus
Pista wrote:We're not saying it was aliens............but it was aliens

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... XdJ7wm4Opk

:eek:

Tsoukalos Rulez :innocent: ;D

Image