Page 1 of 2
Some one asked...
Posted: 10 May 2015, 09:53
by emilystrange
So it's your own fault!
Posted: 10 May 2015, 19:37
by ribbons69
Yes, obviously.
Posted: 10 May 2015, 20:39
by Nikolas Vitus Lagartija
This is going to be as one-sided as the Scottish part of the General Election.
Posted: 10 May 2015, 21:10
by emilystrange
where are the shy no-sters?
Posted: 10 May 2015, 22:19
by Silver_Owl
emilystrange wrote:where are the shy no-sters?
Lurking and awaiting an instant ban once they show their faces, that's where.
Posted: 10 May 2015, 23:41
by eastmidswhizzkid
and it's a yes from me.
as i remember,
scotty hated it,
Blast hated it... not sure who else. the 3 no-voters have chosen to stay anonymous which is beyond cowardly in my opinion...as if it matters that they'll be denounced as not-true-fans...
Posted: 11 May 2015, 00:16
by rien
Well if they're going to get banned if they reveal themselves, no wonder they're not coming forward
(This is a great opportunity to play the forum version of "The Werewolves of Miller's Hollow", though...)
Posted: 11 May 2015, 00:16
by Debaser
ME! It's a waste of vinyl and my time. I'm number 4 and not a'feared to stand up and be counted.
Posted: 11 May 2015, 00:26
by Dan
Yes of course. When I first heard it, it was a new song, and that's something we need more of!
Posted: 11 May 2015, 00:36
by aVoX
Dan wrote:Yes of course. When I first heard it, it was a new song, and that's something we need more of!
Seconded.
Posted: 11 May 2015, 09:02
by Izzy HaveMercy
I voted a whole-hearted NO of course.
BTW, it has been done before, so might pretty well remain the same
IZ.
Posted: 11 May 2015, 09:18
by Silver_Owl
Of course it has.
It's still always nice to see it's continuing popularity.
So. that's Iz and Ness banned so far.
Posted: 11 May 2015, 10:23
by markfiend
I might have to ban myself.
Just kidding of course, I voted "yes".
Posted: 11 May 2015, 10:25
by eastmidswhizzkid
Posted: 11 May 2015, 10:42
by Debaser
Hom_Corleone wrote:
So. that's Iz and Ness banned so far.
You're just a mean boy
Posted: 11 May 2015, 13:35
by Izzy HaveMercy
Promises, promises....
For years on end!
IZ.
Posted: 11 May 2015, 14:10
by jande
I voted 'No' cause it's pants.
Don't bother banning me, I only ever post on 'song title word game' nowadays
Posted: 11 May 2015, 14:11
by Silver_Owl
jande wrote:I voted 'No' cause it's pants.
Don't bother banning me, I only ever post on 'song title word game'
Posted: 11 May 2015, 14:44
by Jeremiah
I voted YES! Mediocre song, but still better than This Corrosion, and at least it doesn't go on for 10 minutes.
Posted: 11 May 2015, 15:11
by Silver_Owl
rien wrote:Well if they're going to get banned if they reveal themselves, no wonder they're not coming forward
An admission of guilt perhaps?
Posted: 11 May 2015, 16:11
by BillyBadBreaks
Hate, loathe, detest etc.
But better than the last xx? years of nothing
Posted: 11 May 2015, 19:57
by Bartek
Yes, I can, and no, i couldn't live alone.
Posted: 12 May 2015, 04:03
by eastmidswhizzkid
Jeremiah wrote:....still better than This Corrosion, and at least it doesn't go on for 10 minutes.
longer versions of TC are available....
....anyway, what the f**k's wrong with This Corrosion??? there ain't half some weirdo's about....
Posted: 12 May 2015, 04:13
by eastmidswhizzkid
jande wrote:
Don't bother banning me, I only ever post on 'song title word game' nowadays
and at least you do appear to understand the game*: no matching
the artists from this HLer! no sirree bob!
*....unlike some- i'd say "you know who you are" but if the rules of the song-title game are beyond you then that may well not be the case...
Posted: 12 May 2015, 20:24
by million voices
It is product
There is so little product
It has to be Yes