Page 1 of 1

Chilcot report out today

Posted: 06 Jul 2016, 12:20
by markfiend
So, what do we think?

Posted: 06 Jul 2016, 12:41
by EvilBastard
Initial reactions? "About bl@@dy time" and "what we long suspected".

Posted: 06 Jul 2016, 13:05
by markfiend
Yup. Takes 7 years to find out that the Pope is indeed a Catholic.

Posted: 06 Jul 2016, 13:05
by Being645
Anyway, here's the link to it for those who want to read it (or the executive summary, at least) ...

http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/the-report/

Posted: 06 Jul 2016, 13:45
by Pista
...in other news...water is wet.

Seven years for this.
& you know what the worst part is? Nothing will change at all.

Posted: 06 Jul 2016, 14:01
by Bartek
Did anyone exppect that such reports, in such cases, are going to change a thing?

Posted: 06 Jul 2016, 20:06
by stufarq
While it says what we all knew to be true, at least it's saying it, and saying it publicly and officially. That, surely, is a good thing.

Although how it manages to be two and a half million pages beggars belief.

Posted: 06 Jul 2016, 20:39
by EvilBastard
stufarq wrote:Although how it manages to be two and a half million pages beggars belief.
Yeah, but after 7 years it would be a bit naff to have handed the Speaker a post-it with the words, "Wow, we fucked up big-time," wouldn't it? I read as far as page 1,216,497, and last sentence just trails off - the remaining pages are just word-searches, doodles, and pictures of kittens*.

*shamelessly stolen from Bill Bailey's analysis of A Brief History of Time.

Posted: 06 Jul 2016, 20:51
by Pista
Yeah, I think after seven years some people might have had a problem with a thirty minute keynote presentation.
It had better have pictures though!

Posted: 06 Jul 2016, 21:00
by EvilBastard
I suppose we ought to be grateful that he didn't put it on Powerpoint and then read.through.each.slide. There is a special circle of hell reserved for these people.

Posted: 06 Jul 2016, 21:10
by Pista
EvilBastard wrote:I suppose we ought to be grateful that he didn't put it on Powerpoint and then read.through.each.slide. There is a special circle of hell reserved for these people.
:lol: :notworthy: :lol: :notworthy:

Posted: 06 Jul 2016, 22:13
by stufarq
Turns out the news report I saw earlier got a bit over-excited. Two and a half million words, not pages. :roll:

Posted: 07 Jul 2016, 09:10
by eastmidswhizzkid
nothing we didn't know already, but as Stu says the fact that the truth is now official is something; especially for the families of the servicemen and women killed or injured in iraq. at least it didnt take as long as the hillsborough report. calls for blair to face charges for war-crimes will of course come to nothing but he did squirm quite nicely for 2 hours in his speech regarding the findings. you aint going to get much more than that i'm afraid.

Posted: 07 Jul 2016, 10:10
by markfiend
I had half expected a whitewash, so there is that

Posted: 07 Jul 2016, 10:33
by Being645
Bartek wrote:Did anyone exppect that such reports, in such cases, are going to change a thing?
Not yet, apparently, as currently mainly African perpetrators are really held responsible for their acts and orders.

But further determined support of the ICC might change that one day, so that leaders worldwide think twice before starting any military action.

Posted: 07 Jul 2016, 11:30
by Bartek
@Being645:
Image

And let not forget that victirous one never paid a price. I would like to see that politicians doing such things, starting wars that caused such terrrible consequences not only to soldiers and their families, relatives and close to them, but for society; i mean, afterall Iraq started what we now see as Daesh, in Paris, Brussels and so, it's all have source there. Of course not that Saddam Hussey (intended!) was nice guy, but for fuck sacke, World tolerates/tolerated and will be tolerate many other countries rulled in almost the same way. It's just a matter of economy and business.

Tis all reminds my a bit of Polanski's "Ghost writer".

Posted: 07 Jul 2016, 11:51
by Silver_Owl
This
War
Is
Wrong

:von:

Posted: 07 Jul 2016, 12:35
by eastmidswhizzkid
saddam did a damned sight better job of maintaining order than anyone since, and probably killed or caused killed less people. regime change (by outside agencies) is not the way for these situations to be sorted.

Posted: 07 Jul 2016, 12:46
by Bartek
That's true, US of A foreign policy was (is?) based of phantasmagoria or parallax that if you thrown dictators and install pro-western puppets everyging will sort out. Same was in Libya, Egypt and Syria. That's just fine way to start culture war on grand scale.

Posted: 07 Jul 2016, 13:37
by stufarq
On which note: hands up to invade Syria.

Posted: 07 Jul 2016, 13:49
by Bartek
Now they "learned" their lesson. Besides, now so~called ISIS is a problem, not Syria.

Posted: 07 Jul 2016, 13:56
by markfiend
Bartek wrote:That's true, US of A foreign policy was (is?) based of phantasmagoria or parallax that if you thrown dictators and install pro-western puppets everyging will sort out. Same was in Libya, Egypt and Syria. That's just fine way to start culture war on grand scale.
See also: The Shah in Iran, Pinochet in Chile, the Contras in Nicaragua, just to name three off the top of my head

Posted: 07 Jul 2016, 14:02
by Bartek
Yes, I'm aware of that, not just Nicaragua, but Central America as whole.
But i was reffering to something more recent. :wink: