Posted: 06 Nov 2016, 05:17
Every club, society, or group to which one may choose to belong has its own rules. Membership of those groups is contingent upon adherence to those rules. If you transgress, you are warned. If you continue to do so you are banished. In some societies that banishment is called "prison", in others it might be called "exile" or "sent to Coventry" (which would be a fate worse than exile, imho).
Your jokes about Montes were not funny. This alone would have had you hanged drawn and quartered in my new republic. An unfunny joke about an ethnic group does not fall under "political correctness" - at worst it falls under "racism", at best there's an embarrassed silence, as we all try to pretend that we didn't hear it and that one of our number thinks that unfunny jokes are acceptable.
My advice, such as it is, is that if you wish to post unfunny ethnic slurs then you start your own forum and do it there. Since we're trying to foster a pleasant atmosphere, an environment where people do not feel threatened by the rants of others, where educated discourse is the order of the day and where, by reasoned argument and debate, we raise ourselves above the baying hoardes, I'd reckon that The Moderator's actions were in keeping with that goal.
You may, of course, disagree. Then again, I wonder why someone who is so clearly opposed to censorship would choose to continue to post in a forum where he believes that censorship exists.
See you next Tuesday.
Your jokes about Montes were not funny. This alone would have had you hanged drawn and quartered in my new republic. An unfunny joke about an ethnic group does not fall under "political correctness" - at worst it falls under "racism", at best there's an embarrassed silence, as we all try to pretend that we didn't hear it and that one of our number thinks that unfunny jokes are acceptable.
My advice, such as it is, is that if you wish to post unfunny ethnic slurs then you start your own forum and do it there. Since we're trying to foster a pleasant atmosphere, an environment where people do not feel threatened by the rants of others, where educated discourse is the order of the day and where, by reasoned argument and debate, we raise ourselves above the baying hoardes, I'd reckon that The Moderator's actions were in keeping with that goal.
You may, of course, disagree. Then again, I wonder why someone who is so clearly opposed to censorship would choose to continue to post in a forum where he believes that censorship exists.
See you next Tuesday.