The Andrew Eldritch fame index
Posted: 28 Oct 2003, 14:13
Extensive* research using the most reliable, modern and up-to-date tools* available has now made it possible to bring you the Andrew Eldritch fame index.
No expense has been spared*, no compromises made in time or effort* to bring you this exciting new way to waste a few seconds of your precious, precious time.
See how your favourite goth/new romantic* legend measures up against the fantastic but diminuitive Mr. Eldritch.
Here comes the list!!!
Entity Rating
------ ------
1. Gary Numan 11.657
2. Morrissey 8.567
3. Robert Smith 5.056
4. Peter Murphy 2.087
5. Ian Astbury 1.256
6. Vonny boy 1.000
7. Daniel Ash 0.716
8. That Guitarist 0.528
9. Carl McCoy 0.272
10. Nik Fiend 0.063
So there you have it. Wow. Who'd have thought that good old Von would be precisely 1.893617 times as famous as the Waynester? Just goes to show what being fat, bald and unable to write decent lyrics does for you...
--
Footnotes:
1. "extensive" is used here in the very specialised sense that includes ideas which you had over lunch that seemed vaguely funny.
2. Google.
3. This phrase is intended to be read "no expense has been incurred".
4. i.e. Half a lunch hour.
5. New romantic heroes were only included so that I could incorporate Gary Numan, because he's great.
No expense has been spared*, no compromises made in time or effort* to bring you this exciting new way to waste a few seconds of your precious, precious time.
See how your favourite goth/new romantic* legend measures up against the fantastic but diminuitive Mr. Eldritch.
Here comes the list!!!
Entity Rating
------ ------
1. Gary Numan 11.657
2. Morrissey 8.567
3. Robert Smith 5.056
4. Peter Murphy 2.087
5. Ian Astbury 1.256
6. Vonny boy 1.000
7. Daniel Ash 0.716
8. That Guitarist 0.528
9. Carl McCoy 0.272
10. Nik Fiend 0.063
So there you have it. Wow. Who'd have thought that good old Von would be precisely 1.893617 times as famous as the Waynester? Just goes to show what being fat, bald and unable to write decent lyrics does for you...
--
Footnotes:
1. "extensive" is used here in the very specialised sense that includes ideas which you had over lunch that seemed vaguely funny.
2. Google.
3. This phrase is intended to be read "no expense has been incurred".
4. i.e. Half a lunch hour.
5. New romantic heroes were only included so that I could incorporate Gary Numan, because he's great.