Page 1 of 1

Tekkie Quesion..

Posted: 25 Mar 2004, 17:02
by Black Planet
Anyone...what is an .ape file?

I'm on soulseek browsing and have run across this type file.

Thanks

BP

Posted: 25 Mar 2004, 17:06
by markfiend
Monkey's Audio Lossless Audio Compression Format

http://filext.com/detaillist.php?extdetail=APE

Posted: 25 Mar 2004, 17:08
by markfiend
Although I haven't a **** clue what that actually means ;D

Posted: 25 Mar 2004, 17:25
by Black Planet
:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:

Dont think I'll be getting any of those then.

Posted: 25 Mar 2004, 17:29
by Loki
Wasn't Monkey in Tales From The Water Margin? Lang Shang Po or something? :roll:

Sorry if I lost the thread. Just thought of monkey that was all. Oh, and the bloke who could run as fast as the wind. He was cool. And probably on drugs as well but I don't think testing was around in 14th century feudal Japan so Rio would have been fine. I suppose.

Posted: 25 Mar 2004, 17:48
by elguiri
Its just a lossless form of music file compression as opposed to e.g MP3 , where you lose some of the sound spectrum and cant get it back once you uncompress the file.So it would make it a good choice for music files as you will always get the original sound , when restored.dont know the compression ratio to original file size though.

Posted: 25 Mar 2004, 17:58
by Izzy HaveMercy
elguiri wrote:Its just a lossless form of music file compression as opposed to e.g MP3 , where you lose some of the sound spectrum and cant get it back once you uncompress the file.So it would make it a good choice for music files as you will always get the original sound , when restored.dont know the compression ratio to original file size though.
Never use the words 'lossless' and 'compression' in the same sentence. Doesn't work....

If it DOES work, the ratio will be 1:1 ;D

But my interest got aroused, so I checked his site...
Gonna try to make a comparison between Monkey and normal MP3 encoding, just to see if Monkey's the new golden egg....

IZ.

Re: Tekkie Quesion..

Posted: 25 Mar 2004, 19:58
by Tuscan Chimaera
Black Planet wrote:Anyone...what is an .ape file?

I'm on soulseek browsing and have run across this type file.

Thanks

BP
Using the internet:

Logging in to online banking:
Display secure and non-secure items?
I f.ing well pressed Log In didn't I?

Doing property searches on primelocation:
Please enter your username and password.
Which one of us is buying, c**t?

Looking something up:
606 Error PAGE CANNOT BE DISPLAYED
Thanks for the explanation, c**t.

Googling for anol:
Did you mean anal ?
SPOT ON MY SUN.

Posted: 26 Mar 2004, 10:36
by markfiend
Izzy HaveMercy wrote:Never use the words 'lossless' and 'compression' in the same sentence. Doesn't work....

If it DOES work, the ratio will be 1:1 ;D
Not necessarily: Zip compression usually squashes things to around 50% without any loss of data.

e.g. I've just tested on a .txt file: original size 1MB (1135310 bytes) zipped file size 472K (480581 bytes). 42.3% of original size and no data lost. :P

Posted: 26 Mar 2004, 10:45
by Loki
markfiend wrote:
Izzy HaveMercy wrote:Never use the words 'lossless' and 'compression' in the same sentence. Doesn't work....

If it DOES work, the ratio will be 1:1 ;D
Not necessarily: Zip compression usually squashes things to around 50% without any loss of data.

e.g. I've just tested on a .txt file: original size 1MB (1135310 bytes) zipped file size 472K (480581 bytes). 42.3% of original size and no data lost. :P
Geeks. :urff:

Posted: 26 Mar 2004, 11:00
by markfiend
Johnny Boy wrote:Geeks. :urff:
Image You're only jealous :wink:

Posted: 26 Mar 2004, 20:01
by Izzy HaveMercy
markfiend wrote:
Izzy HaveMercy wrote:Never use the words 'lossless' and 'compression' in the same sentence. Doesn't work....

If it DOES work, the ratio will be 1:1 ;D
Not necessarily: Zip compression usually squashes things to around 50% without any loss of data.

e.g. I've just tested on a .txt file: original size 1MB (1135310 bytes) zipped file size 472K (480581 bytes). 42.3% of original size and no data lost. :P
Agree with ya on the TXT file, but that is because there is a lot of info in a TXT file that you can get rid of WITHOUT losing info (spaces, for instance), while with music, you can only try to compress when you have exact the same data on left and right channel...which is very rare. There are always very slight differences, and when you start compressing, you always have data loss, no matter what Monkey or others say...

Now who's calling us geeks again, mmmm? :twisted:


IZ.

Posted: 26 Mar 2004, 22:30
by James Blast
Same with images/scans, you end up with what they call 'artefacts' ie. pi$h piccys.

Posted: 26 Mar 2004, 23:14
by Loki
Yes, yes, all very interesting but what was the name of the character who could run as fast as the wind? Going of topic winds me up sooo much ... :innocent: :lol:

Posted: 27 Mar 2004, 00:27
by James Blast
Billy Wizz? ;)

Image

I dropped the 'h'.