US Bootleg ruling

Does exactly what it says on the tin. Some of the nonsense contained herein may be very loosely related to The Sisters of Mercy, but I wouldn't bet your PayPal account on it. In keeping with the internet's general theme nothing written here should be taken as Gospel: over three quarters of it is utter gibberish, and most of the forum's denizens haven't spoken to another human being face-to-face for decades. Don't worry your pretty little heads about it. Above all else, remember this: You don't have to stay forever. I will understand.
Post Reply
User avatar
Happy the Man
Road Kill
Posts: 12
Joined: 02 Aug 2002, 01:00
Location: Perf, Oztraya

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainmen ... 689580.stm

Anyone know what the law is here in the UK?
1 in 3 people have a mental illness. Look at 2 of your friends. If they're normal, then it's you.
Top
User avatar
smiscandlon
Overbomber
Posts: 2595
Joined: 05 Feb 2004, 23:52

"...copies of unauthorised performances of live music..."
Shouldn't that be "unauthorised copies of performances of live music"?

Or do we need to worry about Interpol tracking down and arresting our favourite rock gods for "unauthorised performances"?

:eek:
Top
User avatar
Rivers
Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 135
Joined: 24 Aug 2004, 23:13
Location: Under the forest, near the river, Wales

Surely the band would be taking its name too seriously if they did that? :P
One way to get good sales I suppose.
And we are nothing but experience in the eyes of nature,
And we will live forever in the eyes of nature.
Top
User avatar
James Blast
Banned
Posts: 24699
Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 18:58
Location: back from some place else

I've done the Interpol joke Rivers :oops:
another thread, another time, another girl, another planet
"And when you start to think about death, you start to think about what's after it. And then you start hoping there is a God. For me, it's a frightening thought to go nowhere".
~ Peter Steele
Top
User avatar
Dan
Overbomber
Posts: 2011
Joined: 25 Sep 2002, 01:00
Location: Leeds

Happy the Man wrote:Anyone know what the law is here in the UK?
The law to do with selling bootlegs was changed in the UK somewhere around 1988/89. Up to then there were always huge stalls at record fairs selling bootleg cassettes, and they were able to get away with it due to some loophole in the law. Then in 1988/89 the law was amended and some record fairs in London were raided and the cassettes confiscated and the stallholders fined something like £2000. Then gradually tapes began to appear at record fairs again. Stallholders told me it was worth taking the risk as only a few stalls got raided and they made so much profit they could afford to pay the fine. One stall just had a list and when you'd chosen what you wanted you went out into the car park and he got you the tapes out of the back of his car!

By then bootleg cd's were getting more popular and the law doesn't seem interested any more.

In the last few years all the people who used to sell "proper" bootleg cd's at record fairs have started to sell home-made ones and for me record fairs aren't worth going to any more. The last 2 times I've been I saw loads of things that I might have been interested, if it wasn't for the fact that I downloaded them all off the net in the previous few months. They must visit the same sites as me. All those sellers do is download stuff or copy stuff onto cd-r's and have the damn cheek to charge the same price as a "proper" bootleg cd's. Their cd-r's have gaps, clicks and pops, poorly printed out, poorly cut out covers. £3 to £4 a cd would be a more reasonable price for what they sell, not £10 - £12. In one record fair I went to a couple of years ago there was some c#n+ seling Sisters gigs on cd, and as they were on cd (and we all know that cd#2 usually has about 3 songs on it) he was charging £18 a gig.

As far as the law goes, it was discussed in one of the music papers around the time the law changed. As far as I can remember it's legal to record a live concert as long as it's for your own use and it's legal to give a copy to someone, maybe even legal just to charge money for the materials. It's when you sell them that you cross the line.

The law only applies to music, not interviews, which is how that company called "baktabak" was able to get away with their interview discs. It's just a shame the interviewers never had English as a first language and had the tape recorder up their backsides.

In the big-name record shops I still see bootleg cd's. Last time I looked there were loads of bootleg Jefferson Airplane and Hendrix cd's.
Top
User avatar
smiscandlon
Overbomber
Posts: 2595
Joined: 05 Feb 2004, 23:52

I've been to 3 of the Glasgow record fairs over the last few months. The first, and last time I went I got some pretty good bargains (including 'proper' Sisters boots for £6-£10, a Cure 3-disc set for £8, even a Mish boot for £3!).

However, the second time I went I was absolutely disgusted at some of the traders I saw there. One particular stall had what were clearly bootleg CD's labelled as 'Rare Japanese Imports' and were priced from £20 for a single disc, up to £50 for a 3-disc set! Now they were very nicely produced, professionally printed glossy inlays etc, but I found that absolutely sickening. :evil:
Top
User avatar
markfiend
goriller of form 3b
Posts: 21181
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
Location: st custards
Contact:
Contact markfiend

Dan wrote:In the big-name record shops I still see bootleg cd's.
Now that pisses me off. Someone I know bought a Marilyn Manson (:lol:) boot DVD from HMV; he described it thusly:
Really low-quality live performances that were about a quarter of the screen size, and some of the 'videos' turned out to be a still image with a song playing in the background.
At least when he took it back, HMV refunded him. You buy something like that from a record fair, you're pretty much fucked.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
Top
User avatar
Karst
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1452
Joined: 04 Nov 2002, 00:00
Location: Belfast

This article refers to a recent case in the UK: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3878289.stm

In the end the law is complicated and the record companies will rather go after pirated copies anyway. They often hold no rights over the recordings of the live gigs anyway. Those people selling cheaply produced discs will be moved out of the market anyway. Only when they produce these things in large numbers will the authorities go after them. We did a tribute disc for the Mish and Wayne indicted that if the number of discs did not exceed 250 the rights issues did not apply.
Top
User avatar
JansenClone
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 680
Joined: 14 Mar 2003, 21:51
Location: Pudsey, Leeds

Dan wrote:In the last few years all the people who used to sell "proper" bootleg cd's at record fairs have started to sell home-made ones and for me record fairs aren't worth going to any more.
I think this a case of heads you win, tails you lose. The fact that CDRs / DVD-Rs are easy to make means that we've all (should we want to) got the chance to own far more bootleg recordings in great* (*relatively speaking) quality stored on a loss-less medium.

This does mean that as a consequence that there's far less point in manufacturing 'official' bootlegs (I know, don't read that back too many times!) as folks will:

a - already have ot in higher quality, or

b- just copy it on for free.

So there's fewer of those 'exotic' rare items to own, but a greater quantity of recordings of dubious quality to watch / listen to... I've confused myself over which is better now...

Michael
I am a Leeds United fan because I was very naughty in a previous life.
Top
User avatar
hallucienate
Overbomber
Posts: 4602
Joined: 17 Apr 2002, 01:00
Location: /\/¯¯¯¯¯\/\
Contact:
Contact hallucienate

I dunno, all i know is I ordered a dual-layer DVD Writer this afternoon :)
Top
User avatar
Karst
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1452
Joined: 04 Nov 2002, 00:00
Location: Belfast

Say,
JansenClone wrote:The fact that CDRs / DVD-Rs are easy to make means that we've all (should we want to) got the chance to own far more bootleg recordings in great* (*relatively speaking) quality stored on a loss-less medium.
It certainly is and the popularity of Sharing the Groove is only testement to that. Still there will be people who feel that the technical aspect is too much of an issue for them and prefer to get these recordings through different means.
Top
User avatar
Dan
Overbomber
Posts: 2011
Joined: 25 Sep 2002, 01:00
Location: Leeds

JansenClone wrote:I think this a case of heads you win, tails you lose. The fact that CDRs / DVD-Rs are easy to make means that we've all (should we want to) got the chance to own far more bootleg recordings in great* (*relatively speaking) quality stored on a loss-less medium.
I haven't got anything against people selling cd-r's at record fairs. It's the fact that they charge the same price for their shoddily made discs as they do for the factory made bootlegs that pisses me off.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “General Chat”