Page 1 of 1

Elton John

Posted: 12 Jan 2005, 15:56
by zaltys7
I knew it would only be a matter of time before the vile cnut did something vile, and he hasn't let us down.

Elton John and Rod Stuwert are "remaking" Eric Claptons song Tears in heaven - about his dead son, with Sharon Osbourne on vocals, all in aid of the tsunami appeal.

See told you, VILE.

Paul

Posted: 12 Jan 2005, 16:16
by markfiend
Sharon Osbourne on Vocals? Oh my god! :urff: :urff: :urff: :urff: :urff: :urff: :urff: :urff: :urff: :urff: :urff: :urff: :urff:

Posted: 12 Jan 2005, 16:23
by Thea
Sharon rocks.
The rest of it's a steaming heap though :urff:

Posted: 12 Jan 2005, 16:49
by rian
It will sure turn up to be CRAP!

:innocent:

Posted: 12 Jan 2005, 16:56
by Thea
It's times like this i bet you're all glad they sweary-filter got taken away ;D

Posted: 12 Jan 2005, 17:18
by allfear
OMG this is truely awaful

Re: Elton John

Posted: 12 Jan 2005, 17:51
by lucretia
zaltys7 wrote:I knew it would only be a matter of time before the vile cnut did something vile, and he hasn't let us down.

Elton John and Rod Stuwert are "remaking" Eric Claptons song Tears in heaven - about his dead son, with Sharon Osbourne on vocals, all in aid of the tsunami appeal.

See told you, VILE.

Paul


Truly pukeworthy. The Old Fruit is in South Africa at the moment ... god, I hope Hall doesn't bump into him, cos he's in Cape Town at the moment. Aargh.

Re: Elton John

Posted: 12 Jan 2005, 17:53
by Hojyuu-obi
zaltys7 wrote:I knew it would only be a matter of time before the vile cnut did something vile, and he hasn't let us down.

Elton John and Rod Stuwert are "remaking" Eric Claptons song Tears in heaven - about his dead son, with Sharon Osbourne on vocals, all in aid of the tsunami appeal.

See told you, VILE.

Paul
It's OK to type c**t if you like :wink:

Re: Elton John

Posted: 12 Jan 2005, 18:01
by hallucienate
lucretia wrote:Truly pukeworthy. The Old Fruit is in South Africa at the moment ... god, I hope Hall doesn't bump into him, cos he's in Cape Town at the moment. Aargh.
I don't think we hang out in the same clubs...

Posted: 12 Jan 2005, 20:32
by Brideoffrankenstein
Yep! Vile, vile, vile!!!!!! :evil:

Posted: 12 Jan 2005, 22:06
by Lamia
:urff: :urff: You've just put me off me dinner! :urff: :urff:

Posted: 12 Jan 2005, 22:56
by Shadow_Smile
COME ON YOU WUSSIES!!!!!!!!

this should be fun to watch when they make a vid of the song

That would almost be the same like Michael Jacksong sing A duet with Type O Negative

PURE entertainment !!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Posted: 12 Jan 2005, 23:20
by James Blast
TON with Jacko I can maybe dig, the other one?

Behave!

and please stop with the pictures of yourself on other threads, any threads in factImage

Posted: 12 Jan 2005, 23:42
by Shadow_Smile
James Blast wrote:TON with Jacko I can maybe dig, the other one?

Behave!

and please stop with the pictures of yourself on other threads, any threads in factImage
:lol:

Posted: 13 Jan 2005, 01:37
by boudicca
Ewwww I'm going to have to take a shower now...

I do quite like Sharon, but that advert with Ozzy that's on at the moment gives me a queasy feeling that I can't quite explain (although I suspect it's more to do with the Prince Of F****n' Darkness having become a cuddly TV character that yer gran knows than any moral objection).
Anything that involves Elton makes me want to wash with a brillo pad (or his toupee :lol: :P ).

Posted: 13 Jan 2005, 02:57
by Andrew S
d00mw0lf wrote:Sharon rocks.
The rest of it's a steaming heap though :urff:
I'm not sure it could be any worse than the original. At least it should be funnier.

Re: Elton John

Posted: 13 Jan 2005, 09:01
by paint it black
zaltys7 wrote:
Elton John and Rod Stuwert are "remaking" Eric Claptons song Tears in heaven....
handbags (at 20 paces) and (not quite so) glad (as they might once have been) rags :roll:

actually, i think it's a sincere thing, so it's okay. i think the song is a good choice and they may be utter twats but at least they have the market presence to convince the 'sheep' to part with their cash, which is what it's all about, right? :?

Re: Elton John

Posted: 13 Jan 2005, 09:26
by zaltys7
paint it black wrote:
zaltys7 wrote:
Elton John and Rod Stuwert are "remaking" Eric Claptons song Tears in heaven....
handbags (at 20 paces) and (not quite so) glad (as they might once have been) rags :roll:

actually, i think it's a sincere thing, so it's okay. i think the song is a good choice and they may be utter twats but at least they have the market presence to convince the 'sheep' to part with their cash, which is what it's all about, right? :?
Well......The british public have already given over 100 million, if we raise the same again maybe they wont inflict it on us. Or maybe they will.

Since when did it become possible to type the word c**t then? :)

Paul

Re: Elton John

Posted: 13 Jan 2005, 09:38
by lucretia
hallucienate wrote:
lucretia wrote:Truly pukeworthy. The Old Fruit is in South Africa at the moment ... god, I hope Hall doesn't bump into him, cos he's in Cape Town at the moment. Aargh.
I don't think we hang out in the same clubs...
My God, do you think the old fart still even goes to CLUBS??! But watch out anyway, he is partial to good-looking young men, I hear.
He's here doing photo opportunities with AIDS orphans..
ho hum :roll:

Re: Elton John

Posted: 13 Jan 2005, 09:51
by hallucienate
lucretia wrote: good-looking young men.
gee, thanks :oops: :innocent:

Re: Elton John

Posted: 13 Jan 2005, 10:36
by markfiend
zaltys7 wrote:Since when did it become possible to type the word c**t then?
Since some devious bastard worked out how to circumvent the sweary filter :innocent: :twisted:

However the word "Mission" still gets censored to "m*****n" :lol:

Posted: 13 Jan 2005, 19:44
by Zuma
The people involved are woth tens, if not 100's of millions....perhaps they could just contribute privately without having to inflict their "music" on us...