For the attention of music fans

Does exactly what it says on the tin. Some of the nonsense contained herein may be very loosely related to The Sisters of Mercy, but I wouldn't bet your PayPal account on it. In keeping with the internet's general theme nothing written here should be taken as Gospel: over three quarters of it is utter gibberish, and most of the forum's denizens haven't spoken to another human being face-to-face for decades. Don't worry your pretty little heads about it. Above all else, remember this: You don't have to stay forever. I will understand.
Post Reply
User avatar
Maisey
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1870
Joined: 28 Jun 2006, 20:19
Location: Moving like a Parallelogram

This applies most of all to fans of bleepy synthpop like myself, but the wider implications are obvious.

We all knew that this was happening, now its knocking unpleasantly at the doors of one or two of the music fans on this forum.


Clicky

Comments please
Nationalise the f**king lot.
User avatar
Carpathian Psychonaut
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 902
Joined: 21 Aug 2004, 19:18
Location: Faaaar beyond the black horizon (Gateshead)

I started typing a reply but realised it would seem like a rant and people would tune out half way through. I'll summarise instead and chip in if any of them pique interest !

1)
In this day and age a physical CD should not cost more than it did a few years ago. MP3 albums shouldn't be nearly as dear as physical albums are. 70p for one mp3 track is verging on the ridiculous - once it's made it doesn't need duplication, shipping or any of that. Even the bandwidth used to d/l it from an online shop is the buyers to provide !

2) In the old days an artist or band would release a number of singles and EP's and gradually build a following. The album would then come out and, on the whole, contain 10 or 11 tracks of strong material built up over time. The label would have faith in an artist to do this and know that it won't be an instant return. These days I've seen a first single released one week and the album two weeks later, trading purely off the back of one quick hit. This leads to rushed filler-laden albums with some obviously low grade extras tacked on. People won't go back after being stung.

3) Labels have no quality control, seemingly. While the record industry continue to throw megabucks at boys in suits doing covers on TV panto-talent shows, or the 37 latest newcomers of the current sound "in" with "the kids", they will have a large number of failed and dropped artists. They seem to employ a scattergun rather than sniper approach. I find myself somewhat angered by being made to feel that a label peddling such things doing badly is somehow my fault even though they'd have nothing anybody with half an ear of taste would want.

4) I download albums and, scarily for my bank balance, I buy more music now than ever. There are bands I would never have chanced on buying a cd by but having heard a few first I've been happy to grab some and build a collection. I have a personal approach such that if I download something and like it I'll put it on a list to buy. If I d/l something and it's trash then I delete it and not even store it anywhere - this is my quality control buffer. To think I could have paid £n for that is insulting.

These are all common sense, to me. If labels rush out artists before they're ready and sign up reams of bands without a longsight scheme in place they will have artists fall by the wayside and will have poor sales on their investment. This isn't due to the demon of downloading but due to short sighted chasing of the English Zlot and not the love of the artist they're pushing. Can you imagine a label these days letting a band put four or five singles out before the album like they used to, even if the first few only caught a few peoples attention ? No, thought not.

{climbs down from soap-box AND high horse}

Phew, I feel better for that... :lol:
.
You’ll Disappear Before The Next Star Rises
.
User avatar
Maisey
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1870
Joined: 28 Jun 2006, 20:19
Location: Moving like a Parallelogram

I download albums and, scarily for my bank balance, I buy more music now than ever. There are bands I would never have chanced on buying a cd by but having heard a few first I've been happy to grab some and build a collection. I have a personal approach such that if I download something and like it I'll put it on a list to buy. If I d/l something and it's trash then I delete it and not even store it anywhere - this is my quality control buffer. To think I could have paid £n for that is insulting.
They say pretty clearly that people that download and then buy are in the shocking minority. I download and buy what I like, so I therefore don't feel responsible for the demise of a fine label. But the sheer overwhelming amounts of people that do pretty much cancel us out
Nationalise the f**king lot.
User avatar
Carpathian Psychonaut
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 902
Joined: 21 Aug 2004, 19:18
Location: Faaaar beyond the black horizon (Gateshead)

Maisey wrote:They say pretty clearly that people that download and then buy are in the shocking minority. I download and buy what I like, so I therefore don't feel responsible for the demise of a fine label. But the sheer overwhelming amounts of people that do pretty much cancel us out
I appreciate that and it is a shame when a good label comes to that sort of end, but I abhor being tarred with the same brush because of the actions of others. That applies to many things but very much to this too.....
.
You’ll Disappear Before The Next Star Rises
.
ShadyRacing
Road Kill
Posts: 35
Joined: 24 Dec 2006, 03:10

if 5000 dowload a certain album. its not said that these 5000 would have bought it at all. (assuming that downloading music for free wasn't possible anymore)

i think the ratio is 1:100 or even worse.

so 5000 downloads is just 50 lost sales. and not 5000.
User avatar
markfiend
goriller of form 3b
Posts: 20424
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
Location: st custards
Contact:

The music industry is like the boy who cried wolf. While to a certain degree, I do think that this time the wolf is real, anyone remember this?

Image
advanced, forthright, signifficant
User avatar
Badlander
Overbomber
Posts: 3562
Joined: 16 Feb 2006, 20:17
Location: My City of Ruins

markfiend wrote: Image
What a nice avatar this would make... :innocent: :wink:

BTW the only thing I'm no longer paying for is bootlegs. But right now I'm buying more officially released music than ever. :roll:
I'd end this moment to be with you
Through morphic oceans I'd lay here with you
User avatar
Episkopos
Road Kill
Posts: 52
Joined: 30 Oct 2006, 10:21
Contact:

Carpathian Psychonaut wrote:These are all common sense, to me. If labels rush out artists before they're ready and sign up reams of bands without a longsight scheme in place they will have artists fall by the wayside and will have poor sales on their investment. This isn't due to the demon of downloading but due to short sighted chasing of the English Zlot and not the love of the artist they're pushing. Can you imagine a label these days letting a band put four or five singles out before the album like they used to, even if the first few only caught a few peoples attention ? No, thought not.
I will agree that it's a case of the industry as a whole reaping what it's sown, but it doesn't seem fair on the likes of Dependent who seem to be genuinely trying to do a decent job. Intellectual property theft of any sort is perhaps acceptable if you're stealing from someone who isn't going to be crippled by the loss and whose artistic practices deserve it, but if the demon downloaders don't take that cherry-picking approach then they're just hitting everyone in the industry hard, and that's the rub.
Kiss me, I'm Eldritch.
User avatar
markfiend
goriller of form 3b
Posts: 20424
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
Location: st custards
Contact:

Aye.

And maybe (being generous to his foresight here perhaps) Andrew saw which way the wind was blowing yonks ago, and this is why he's not bothered to put out new material.

You may as well just tour to earn your cash these days, you're not going to make a penny from sales with the ubiquity of downloads.
advanced, forthright, signifficant
User avatar
Zuma
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1831
Joined: 24 Jan 2003, 00:36

markfiend wrote:Aye.

And maybe (being generous to his foresight here perhaps) Andrew saw which way the wind was blowing yonks ago, and this is why he's not bothered to put out new material.

You may as well just tour to earn your cash these days, you're not going to make a penny from sales with the ubiquity of downloads.
Fair point Mark, why not then make at least even one track available somehow, download or whatever if you are not going to make money from it regardless?
We've been round and round this so many times mind you, I refuse to get the grumps on this time :)
User avatar
markfiend
goriller of form 3b
Posts: 20424
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
Location: st custards
Contact:

Zuma wrote:Fair point Mark, why not then make at least even one track available somehow, download or whatever if you are not going to make money from it regardless?
Guessing because he's a curmudgeonly old git and can't be bothered. ;)
Zuma wrote:We've been round and round this so many times mind you, I refuse to get the grumps on this time :)
Aye, like you say, round and round... :lol:
advanced, forthright, signifficant
Post Reply