Page 1 of 6

Man, I haven't been active enough here.

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 00:04
by Rosalie
Must shock people.



I am a transsexual.

Discuss.

Re: Man, I haven't been active enough here.

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 00:05
by Silver_Owl
Rosalie wrote:Must shock people.



I am a transsexual.

Discuss.
Must try harder one thinks.

Re: Man, I haven't been active enough here.

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 00:16
by Scardwel
Rosalie wrote:Must shock people.

I am a transsexual.

Discuss.
Well I certainly won't be stuffing your turkey this Christmas (I prefer the real thing!) :urff:

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 00:17
by Rosalie
Right.

I once removed my sock with my teeth.

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 00:18
by James Blast
"Man, I haven't been active enough here"

yeah, it was nice again... for a while

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 00:38
by Rosalie
James Blast wrote:"Man, I haven't been active enough here"

yeah, it was nice again... for a while
Always a pleasure.

Re: Man, I haven't been active enough here.

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 01:22
by Rosalie
Scardwel wrote:
Rosalie wrote:Must shock people.

I am a transsexual.

Discuss.
Well I certainly won't be stuffing your turkey this Christmas (I prefer the real thing!) :urff:
I'm sorry I make you hurl. Perhaps if you were a bit more open minded as to not consider me a "fake" person :)

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 01:34
by James Blast
aren't we all 'fake persons' on this interweb?

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 01:34
by Scardwel
No Rosaline, you don't make me "hurl". I just prefer real pussy over "modified males". Each to their own. :)

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 01:44
by Silver_Owl
Scardwel wrote:No Rosaline, you don't make me "hurl". I just prefer real pussy over "modified males". Each to their own. :)
Give Bangkok a miss then Simon. You won't know who's Arthur and who's Martha.

"I don?t find them attractive, it?s just confusing...."

Image

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 03:44
by Rosalie
Scardwel wrote:No Rosaline, you don't make me "hurl". I just prefer real pussy over "modified males". Each to their own. :)
There's no real biological difference between a "Modified" vagina and a natural born one, apart from the lack of uterus of course. Surgeons have gotten very good at that kind of thing.

The sooner people stop considering transsexual women as anything male, the better.

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 09:01
by CellThree
Ooo! Sir! Female men Sir? Ooo! Suit you Sir!

Image

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 11:04
by Dark
Dark's Contribution: "Oh. Ok, cool."

Discussion closed. :)

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 12:05
by timsinister
Considering the general opinion since your stunning debut, I thought you'd want to keep your head down! :wink:

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 16:12
by Rosalie
timsinister wrote:Considering the general opinion since your stunning debut, I thought you'd want to keep your head down! :wink:
What was the "general opinion", exactly?

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 17:39
by aims
Something east of a lack of consensus probably.

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 17:41
by boudicca
Hom_Corleone wrote:"I don?t find them attractive, it?s just confusing...."

Image
:lol: :notworthy: :lol: :notworthy: :lol: :notworthy: :lol:

Classic.

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 20:44
by Thea
Wtf? :|

Re: Man, I haven't been active enough here.

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 22:23
by _emma_
Rosalie wrote:Must shock people.



I am a transsexual.

Discuss.
If you're joking, I think it's a stupid joke. If you're serious, I don't care. I'm much more interested in your approach to bugs and foxes than your sex life. Honestly.

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 22:24
by eastmidswhizzkid
Rosalie wrote:
timsinister wrote:Considering the general opinion since your stunning debut, I thought you'd want to keep your head down! :wink:
What was the "general opinion", exactly?
as you're very well aware...perhaps getting beyond that is too much and you can only enjoy interacting as the underdog/victim.perhaps thats why you left /were thrown off the other forum.all i can say is,if you want people to react to you as anything other than an attention seeker then you've got to stop being an attention seeker.
you'll get attention here alright - but of the p1ss-taking kind you don't seem to be able to handle.

...and of course there's a difference between a "natural" vagina and that of a transexual.one is attached to a woman ,one is attached to someone with an enormous adam's apple and hands like a scandinavian goalkeeper!as a woman i should think it's easyfor you to tell blokes that we're being small-minded for not wanting to shag men who've had their dicks turned inside out.

Re: Man, I haven't been active enough here.

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 22:24
by Cimmerian
Rosalie wrote:Must shock people.



I am a transsexual.

Discuss.
Lucky you.

Quite why you feel the need to provoke I do not know.

"Must shock people." Jesus. :roll:

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 22:28
by aims
eastmidswhizzkid wrote:...and of course there's a difference between a "natural" vagina and that of a transexual.one is attached to a woman ,one is attached to someone with an enormous adam's apple and hands like a scandinavian goalkeeper!
I can assure you that that would not be the case if I had the op. Not all of us are so manually endowed.

But I'm not soliciting my phoney fanny, so I'll pipe down ;)

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 22:30
by boudicca
Motz wrote:manually endowed.
Motz also wrote:phoney fanny
:notworthy: :lol: :notworthy: :lol: :notworthy:

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 23:00
by _emma_
Rosalie wrote:There's no real biological difference between a "Modified" vagina and a natural born one, apart from the lack of uterus of course. Surgeons have gotten very good at that kind of thing.
Okay. Uterus doesn't matter as it's enough nuisance for us "natural" girls anyway, but what about the G-point? :?

Posted: 31 Jul 2005, 23:02
by canon docre
_emma_ wrote: ... but what about the G-point? :?
That's a myth anyway.