Page 1 of 1

Sometimes...

Posted: 09 Nov 2005, 00:28
by bshowers
Sometimes... just for sheets and giggles, I go to the Sisters page, and click on Record News. You know, just for the fun of it.

Posted: 09 Nov 2005, 08:06
by Ozpat
Yeah! At least three times a week... :lol:

They should add another one named "DVD news". :?

Posted: 09 Nov 2005, 08:17
by Mr. Wah
I go there too, sometimes. Occasionally. Very occasionally. I feel much better now.

Being a Sisters fan is almost like suffering from some form of OCD... you know that nothing new's really there on that page, but you have to keep checking anyway.

When Von gets to 50, I'm calling the whole thing a day. (Personally, I think he's avoided self-parody remarkably well up to now.) In any case, you can't wear leather trousers at that age.

I have very mixed feelings about this business of a new record, which I'm sure many others here share. I think the chances of us ever seeing one are dwindling, regardless. Quite simply, as time marches on, the probability of any record company agreeing to meet the Sisters' well documented monetary needs falls ever further.

I think, mostly, I'm grateful for what we've got already.

Posted: 09 Nov 2005, 08:37
by Ozpat
Mr. Wah wrote:I go there too, sometimes. Occasionally. Very occasionally. I feel much better now.

Being a Sisters fan is almost like suffering from some form of OCD... you know that nothing new's really there on that page, but you have to keep checking anyway.

When Von gets to 50, I'm calling the whole thing a day. (Personally, I think he's avoided self-parody remarkably well up to now.) In any case, you can't wear leather trousers at that age.

I have very mixed feelings about this business of a new record, which I'm sure many others here share. I think the chances of us ever seeing one are dwindling, regardless. Quite simply, as time marches on, the probability of any record company agreeing to meet the Sisters' well documented monetary needs falls ever further.

I think, mostly, I'm grateful for what we've got already.
http://www.myheartland.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=8767 8)

Re: Sometimes...

Posted: 09 Nov 2005, 08:43
by Norman Hunter
bshowers wrote:Sometimes... just for sheets and giggles, I go to the Sisters page, and click on Record News. You know, just for the fun of it.
I used to muse about what would come first - Leeds United winning the Premiership or new Sisters material. Granted both came reasonably close in the late nineties/early noughties, but considering the current climate my money is on the first :eek:

Re: Sometimes...

Posted: 09 Nov 2005, 10:59
by Planet Dave
Norman Hunter wrote:
bshowers wrote:Sometimes... just for sheets and giggles, I go to the Sisters page, and click on Record News. You know, just for the fun of it.
I used to muse about what would come first - Leeds United winning the Premiership or new Sisters material. Granted both came reasonably close in the late nineties/early noughties, but considering the current climate my money is on the first :eek:
A fool and his money.... :wink:

Posted: 09 Nov 2005, 11:26
by markfiend
Dave, you know I'm not a Leeds fan by any stretch, but...

You're betting on :von: then? :eek:

Posted: 09 Nov 2005, 11:52
by Spiggy's hat
..

Edited due to Mr Hat not reading the posts correctly. :oops:

Much as I love Leeds, my money on this one has to be with Von climaxing first.

Posted: 09 Nov 2005, 12:35
by timsinister
Spiggy's Hat wrote:my money on this one has to be with Von climaxing first.
I certainly didn't need to hear that one! :|

Posted: 09 Nov 2005, 13:27
by Planet Dave
markfiend wrote:Dave, you know I'm not a Leeds fan by any stretch, but...

You're betting on :von: then? :eek:
Yep. The fact I'd bet on him before United win the league again is neither here nor there. :evil: Annoying, but more so for the Glazer demons. :twisted:

Posted: 09 Nov 2005, 17:13
by eastmidswhizzkid
surely the clever money's on neither happening ever again? i'ld put up with leeds being champions if we got a new record.

Posted: 09 Nov 2005, 18:40
by bshowers
Just checked the Records News a moment ago. Just to save you people the effort: Nothing's changed.

Brian

Posted: 09 Nov 2005, 19:21
by aims
What did you expect to find?

It's just like always here again" ;)

Posted: 09 Nov 2005, 21:32
by boudicca
Mr. Wah wrote:When Von gets to 50, I'm calling the whole thing a day. (Personally, I think he's avoided self-parody remarkably well up to now.) In any case, you can't wear leather trousers at that age.
WHO SAYS!?!? :innocent:

(Just a female perspective, you understand. :wink: )

Posted: 09 Nov 2005, 21:34
by aims
boudicca wrote:(Just a female perspective, you understand. :wink: )
Not exclusively ;)

I'm sure he thinks he'll look good in them at 50...:innocent:

Posted: 09 Nov 2005, 21:44
by pikkrong
boudicca wrote:
Mr. Wah wrote:When Von gets to 50, I'm calling the whole thing a day. (Personally, I think he's avoided self-parody remarkably well up to now.) In any case, you can't wear leather trousers at that age.
WHO SAYS!?!? :innocent:

(Just a female perspective, you understand. :wink: )
It depends. On trousers.

Posted: 09 Nov 2005, 21:47
by boudicca
pikkrong wrote:
boudicca wrote:
Mr. Wah wrote:When Von gets to 50, I'm calling the whole thing a day. (Personally, I think he's avoided self-parody remarkably well up to now.) In any case, you can't wear leather trousers at that age.
WHO SAYS!?!? :innocent:

(Just a female perspective, you understand. :wink: )
It depends. On trousers.
Says you! :lol: :wink:

Posted: 09 Nov 2005, 21:51
by pikkrong
boudicca wrote:
pikkrong wrote:
boudicca wrote: WHO SAYS!?!? :innocent:

(Just a female perspective, you understand. :wink: )
It depends. On trousers.
Says you! :lol: :wink:
I know what I say.

Posted: 10 Nov 2005, 04:47
by Mr. Wah
boudicca wrote:
Mr. Wah wrote:When Von gets to 50, I'm calling the whole thing a day. (Personally, I think he's avoided self-parody remarkably well up to now.) In any case, you can't wear leather trousers at that age.
WHO SAYS!?!? :innocent:

(Just a female perspective, you understand. :wink: )
Love is blind? :wink:

Posted: 10 Nov 2005, 10:01
by canon docre
boudicca wrote:
Mr. Wah wrote:When Von gets to 50, I'm calling the whole thing a day. (Personally, I think he's avoided self-parody remarkably well up to now.) In any case, you can't wear leather trousers at that age.
WHO SAYS!?!? :innocent:

(Just a female perspective, you understand. :wink: )
just one female perspective if I may add. :wink:

Not necessarily mine. ;D

Posted: 10 Nov 2005, 10:12
by MadameButterfly
canon docre wrote:
boudicca wrote:
Mr. Wah wrote:When Von gets to 50, I'm calling the whole thing a day. (Personally, I think he's avoided self-parody remarkably well up to now.) In any case, you can't wear leather trousers at that age.
WHO SAYS!?!? :innocent:

(Just a female perspective, you understand. :wink: )
just one female perspective if I may add. :wink:

Not necessarily mine. ;D
In this case I would say my perspective is :von: could be older than 50 and in leather trousers..it would still put me in my heaven! ;D

Posted: 10 Nov 2005, 12:50
by MrChris
pikkrong wrote:
boudicca wrote:
Mr. Wah wrote:When Von gets to 50, I'm calling the whole thing a day. (Personally, I think he's avoided self-parody remarkably well up to now.) In any case, you can't wear leather trousers at that age.
WHO SAYS!?!? :innocent:

(Just a female perspective, you understand. :wink: )
It depends. On trousers.
May I deign to suggest that it depends at least as much on legs? :D