Page 1 of 1
Group Dynamics
Posted: 27 Dec 2005, 23:27
by Johnny M
Aren't they fascinating? They've always appealed to me as I have a degree in Psychology - and before someone pipes up - and Metaphysical Victorian Love Poetry. An enlightened man would say they're the same thing.
Will you find another forum to be together? Or just drift?
Love to you all.
PS: @ Mr Forres. No offence meant and none taken.
Posted: 27 Dec 2005, 23:29
by aims
C'est finis, John?
Re: Group Dynamics
Posted: 27 Dec 2005, 23:37
by scotty
Johnny M wrote:
PS: @ Mr Forres. No offence meant and none taken.
Ditto.
Posted: 28 Dec 2005, 00:25
by boudicca
The Kryptic Factor strikes again...
Re: Group Dynamics
Posted: 28 Dec 2005, 00:35
by Francis
Johnny M wrote:I have a degree in Psychology ... and Metaphysical Victorian Love Poetry.
I'd never have guessed.
Posted: 28 Dec 2005, 00:46
by lazarus corporation
As I understand it, the whole social psychology field has been shook recently by the theory of social connectionism (connectivism?), which as I understand it - and I don't have a degree in psychology (although I do develop web based eLearning resources for degree-level Psychology) - is like chaos theory (from physics) applied to social psychology.
Which would explain a lot.
Posted: 28 Dec 2005, 01:29
by paint it black
how fast is the group going and is it in water or air
Posted: 28 Dec 2005, 01:53
by lazarus corporation
I have this vague idea you're talking
fluid dynamics there, PiB...
Posted: 28 Dec 2005, 02:05
by aims
So if you apply chaos to group dynamics, do you get similar turbulence to fluid dynamics?
And do psychologists gloss over it in the same way that physicists do?
Posted: 28 Dec 2005, 02:11
by lazarus corporation
we're publishing books about it next year - until then you're as in the dark about it as me
Re: Group Dynamics
Posted: 28 Dec 2005, 02:45
by The Pope
x
Man Ray 2003 Opening Track
Posted: 28 Dec 2005, 02:57
by lazarus corporation
Motz wrote:So if you apply chaos to group dynamics, do you get similar turbulence to fluid dynamics?
And do psychologists gloss over it in the same way that physicists do?
...although I'm hoping that it means that the hapless flapping of a social butterfly in New York can create a storm at a dinner party in Islington.
Posted: 28 Dec 2005, 10:37
by Eva
You've seen it: the mere rumour of a social butterfly flapping in Las Vegas is enough to create a hurricane in Europe....
Posted: 28 Dec 2005, 12:16
by Dark
lazarus corporation wrote:you're as in the dark about it as me
Should I be worried?
Posted: 28 Dec 2005, 13:08
by aims
More to the point, should I be jealous?
Posted: 28 Dec 2005, 13:22
by lazarus corporation
no, I think you're both safe there
Posted: 28 Dec 2005, 13:28
by scotty
lazarus corporation wrote:I have this vague idea you're talking fluid dynamics
See, that I understand
Posted: 28 Dec 2005, 13:29
by aims
Thank goodness for that
Don't know how I'm going to swing innocence when the Nine Inch Nails topic comes up at Easter now though.
Lee wins
Posted: 28 Dec 2005, 21:57
by eastmidswhizzkid
surely this means you (and
dark) win too?
Posted: 29 Dec 2005, 01:50
by boudicca
Posted: 29 Dec 2005, 02:12
by Francis
Johnny Vegas.
Posted: 30 Dec 2005, 16:15
by emilystrange
no. i'm here in the dark with you. hold my hand, will you? it's scary.
Posted: 31 Dec 2005, 22:46
by Johnny M
Is this all it has come to? After all?
Posted: 31 Dec 2005, 22:48
by emilystrange
apparently so. but there's a new one in approx 2 hours time.
Posted: 07 Jan 2006, 21:02
by pikkrong
Francis wrote:
Johnny Vegas.
Johnny and Vegas?