Heartland

1. "I Was Wrong"
2. "Floorshow"
3. No Pearson songs
4. A bassist
5. A drummer

Ranked in order of likelihood, from "Might happen" to "No way, José".

A drummer?

I agree Dr. Avalanche should hand his bass-function back to a living person again, but a drummer

1. Anouncement of new material to be released (dvd/cd's)
2. Great performance
3. New songs
4. Great tour shirt
5. Brilliant one liners
6. New intro
7. Burn
8. Heartland
9. Valentine
10. Nice not yet performed cover

mugabe wrote:
5. A drummer

"I Was Wrong"

Yes, you were

pikkrong wrote:

mugabe wrote:
5. A drummer

"I Was Wrong"

Yes, you were

Adrenochrome

vicus wrote:Adrenochrome

Not bad!!!

Obviousman wrote:A drummer?

I agree Dr. Avalanche should hand his bass-function back to a living person again, but a drummer

Yup. Screw this cramped and rigid "industrial groove machine" singback thing and get some space for rocking. Even the puppets in Depeche Mode have come to realise this. IMHO, Doktor Avalanche isn't what defines The Sisters - the songs are. Also, it would be a move further away from that persistent g*th label and into rock'n'roll territory.

Anyway, it's probably as hypothetical an issue as Motorhead dropping Mikkey Dee for a TR-505.

I'd go for Adrenochrome too, but if they did, there's an above average chance they'd trash it badly, like Floorshow in 93.

1) When You Don't See Me
2) Sister Ray
3) Black Planet
4) Torch
5) Damage Done
6) Something new

In order of likeliness.

IMHO: Gimme Gimme Gimme perhaps?
Or a trip back to the old days with Jolene?
Now THAT rocks!
P'raps an old Joy Division cover?
Transmission by Bauhaus @ Brixton Academy t'other friday woz FCUKIN BUZZIN!

Emma

Blood Money

Poison Door

Nine While Nine

Valentine

Heartland

Nothing post '87, and hoping they'll be better than the last time I saw them.

Actually, I think I'll add "Psychonaut Lib III" and "Severina" to the list.

Afterhours..... a 40 min version. Then something to jump about to.

im wiv pat & the afterhours,
(only old gits will get this:)
but having it played on 33rpm not 45rpm!
that used to drive the neighbours wild!LOL!

Dry ice.
Kick drum so hard it hurts your ribcage.
Ghost Rider.
"Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls..."
Valentine.

You Could Be the One and they as yet unheard 30 min. version of Never Land (no longer a fragment)

mugabe wrote:

Obviousman wrote:A drummer?

I agree Dr. Avalanche should hand his bass-function back to a living person again, but a drummer

Yup. Screw this cramped and rigid "industrial groove machine" singback thing and get some space for rocking. Even the puppets in Depeche Mode have come to realise this. IMHO, Doktor Avalanche isn't what defines The Sisters - the songs are. Also, it would be a move further away from that persistent g*th label and into rock'n'roll territory.

Anyway, it's probably as hypothetical an issue as Motorhead dropping Mikkey Dee for a TR-505.

I see your point, but still I'm very fond of the good Doktor Or you'd have to be looking for a very 'machine-y' drummer, at which point everyone'll start throwing in even more rip-off comments Probably of bands newer than the Sisters. I often find bands that stop using drum-machines to be less, hmm, energetic, driven compared to when they did use it. Not that I know that many

Let me see, my wishlist:

I'd go for the witty comments, some new songs and great cover versions, the 40 minutes version of Afterhours would be cool to though

And as someone else said before: Jihad, would make sense, wouldn't it

The Doktor does not define the SOM but is most definately one of the mainstay pillars in its foundations, such as sunglasses, thought-provoking lyrics & humourous quips

James Blast wrote:30 min. version of Never Land

7 minutes 35 seconds too short for you?

Dark wrote:

James Blast wrote:30 min. version of Never Land

7 minutes 35 seconds too short for you?

way too short and naff quality to boot

bushman*pm wrote:im wiv pat & the afterhours

and welcome.

James Blast wrote:

Dark wrote:

James Blast wrote:30 min. version of Never Land

7 minutes 35 seconds too short for you?

way too short and naff quality to boot

I could have a bash at fixing it,if you'd like.

Pat wrote:

James Blast wrote:

Dark wrote: 7 minutes 35 seconds too short for you?

way too short and naff quality to boot

I could have a bash at fixing it,if you'd like.

nice idea Pat but it could never match the original for lushness, thankee anyway

Torch. With panpipes and all.