I'll give it a goJames Blast wrote:nah, its a good read
but maybies for us blokes who were moving from prog to punk, like I was
still a good book


I'll give it a goJames Blast wrote:nah, its a good read
but maybies for us blokes who were moving from prog to punk, like I was
still a good book
Thanks for the thought thoughJames Blast wrote:nae probs, I'd send ye it, but some daft bastard I ken has had it fur 3 months now!
and no, he hasn't even opened the covers!
Erm...Obviousman wrote:I am very much a pacifist and against the Irak war, but, does anyone else find terrorist attacks on your own county are the wrong reason to pull back from a warruffers wrote:A key difference is that the Spanish then changed their policy re Iraq and that ain't gonna happen here.![]()
Thanks for freshing my mind upGanith wrote:Erm...
Actually we didn't pull back exactly because of the terrorist attack. People voted Zapatero because of the attack, and he had promised to leave Irak way before the bombs. People were scared sh*tless. The bomb was on the 11th, and the elections on the 14th. It was the logical result of good timing on some bastard's part.
lazarus corporation wrote:are you saying that all blanket statements like that are ridiculous?Quiff Boy wrote:blanket statements like that are ridiculous.
canon docre wrote:For example?Black Biscuit wrote:I am of the opinion that some of the things said by feminists and lesbians are indeed crap.
i think you'll find that Lazcorp was taking the p*ss out of the Quiffmeister for his blanket statement about blanket statements.Black Biscuit wrote:lazarus corporation wrote:are you saying that all blanket statements like that are ridiculous?Quiff Boy wrote:blanket statements like that are ridiculous.
---- Correct me if I am wrong (yes, I don't mind being corrected if I am wrong) but I don't recall actually making any 'blanket statement'. Or is someone just being petty?
Yea, indeed there was no good reason to go to war in the first place, I completely agree...Ganith wrote:Sure it's not a good reason!
But there was never a good reason to go to war, so...
a gold star for the Rutlandman.eastmidswhizzkid wrote:i think you'll find that Lazcorp was taking the p*ss out of the Quiffmeister for his blanket statement about blanket statements.Black Biscuit wrote:lazarus corporation wrote: are you saying that all blanket statements like that are ridiculous?
---- Correct me if I am wrong (yes, I don't mind being corrected if I am wrong) but I don't recall actually making any 'blanket statement'. Or is someone just being petty?
Black Biscuit wrote:canon docre wrote:For example?Black Biscuit wrote:I am of the opinion that some of the things said by feminists and lesbians are indeed crap.
Here's a classic case of sour grapes. A middle-aged women I once knew became a dyke following her divorce and became a firm believer in some sort of self-styled 'sexual apartheid' in which men and women should be segregated and not allowed to mingle/cohabitate, etc. Pure crap and a fine example of someone putting their own 'stuff' on others.
Actually - I think its one of the story lines from Tales of the City by Armistead Maupincanon docre wrote:Black Biscuit wrote:canon docre wrote: For example?
Here's a classic case of sour grapes. A middle-aged women I once knew became a dyke following her divorce and became a firm believer in some sort of self-styled 'sexual apartheid' in which men and women should be segregated and not allowed to mingle/cohabitate, etc. Pure crap and a fine example of someone putting their own 'stuff' on others.![]()
Isnt't this story from your personal background another "fine example of someone putting their own 'stuff' on others"?
James Blast wrote:Armistead Maupin 'is a man I dreamt up'
think about it
canon docre wrote:Black Biscuit wrote:canon docre wrote: For example?
Here's a classic case of sour grapes. A middle-aged women I once knew became a dyke following her divorce and became a firm believer in some sort of self-styled 'sexual apartheid' in which men and women should be segregated and not allowed to mingle/cohabitate, etc. Pure crap and a fine example of someone putting their own 'stuff' on others.![]()
Isnt't this story from your personal background another "fine example of someone putting their own 'stuff' on others"?
Jesus Christ, I knew you lot could be a bunch of pedantic bastards but come on, even I knew what QB meant and I only lurk here!lazarus corporation wrote:a gold star for the Rutlandman.eastmidswhizzkid wrote:i think you'll find that Lazcorp was taking the p*ss out of the Quiffmeister for his blanket statement about blanket statements.Black Biscuit wrote:
---- Correct me if I am wrong (yes, I don't mind being corrected if I am wrong) but I don't recall actually making any 'blanket statement'. Or is someone just being petty?
in all fairness Qb's (valid) opinion was one that 99.9% of HLers would already have held.Cimmerian wrote:...he was making a very specific point, and one I'd agree with, that Mr Biscuits comment was crass, vulgar and bordering on the offensive. And in my opinion LazCorp’s attempt at wit merely detracted from the point QB was trying to make.
I second Ganith in everything.Ganith wrote:Glad you people are ok. I think I have an idea of how you feel. It's a f*cking sh*t, but I'm sure we'll manage to stop it somehow.
I have to believe that we will!
Erm...Obviousman wrote:I am very much a pacifist and against the Irak war, but, does anyone else find terrorist attacks on your own county are the wrong reason to pull back from a warruffers wrote:A key difference is that the Spanish then changed their policy re Iraq and that ain't gonna happen here.![]()
Actually we didn't pull back exactly because of the terrorist attack. People voted Zapatero because of the attack, and he had promised to leave Irak way before the bombs. People were scared sh*tless. The bomb was on the 11th, and the elections on the 14th. It was the logical result of good timing on some bastard's part.
Stay well!
Maybe she's not far wrong. Let's face it, men 1) are genetically inferior to women (in the sense that they possess a smaller set of chromosones, and in the sense that men's genes are more likely to degrade over time)Black Biscuit wrote:canon docre wrote:Black Biscuit wrote:
Here's a classic case of sour grapes. A middle-aged women I once knew became a dyke following her divorce and became a firm believer in some sort of self-styled 'sexual apartheid' in which men and women should be segregated and not allowed to mingle/cohabitate, etc. Pure crap and a fine example of someone putting their own 'stuff' on others.![]()
Isnt't this story from your personal background another "fine example of someone putting their own 'stuff' on others"?
Ha ha ha. Yeah, right- that's quite an interpretation of the events!
You mean that you take offense at THIS:Cimmerian wrote:Jesus Christ, I knew you lot could be a bunch of pedantic bastards but come on, even I knew what QB meant and I only lurk here!
Note his usage of the phrase "like that", proving that no he was not actually making a blanket statement at all. Far from it, he was making a very specific point, and one I'd agree with, that Mr Biscuits comment was crass, vulgar and bordering on the offensive. And in my opinion LazCorp’s attempt at wit merely detracted from the point QB was trying to make.
@ Mr Biscuit: are you really as much of an obnoxious wanker was your recent posts make you out to be? Or are you just going through a hard time in your personal life? I've not really enjoyed reading your posts in the last couple of weeks. Are you sure you aren't one of the resident trolls returned with an older ID?
I don't think "petty" enters into it. A comment like that would get you banned from some forums. Grow up.
Black Biscuit wrote: Correct me if I am wrong (yes, I don't mind being corrected if I am wrong) but I don't recall actually making any 'blanket statement'. Or is someone just being petty?