hello, I make no excuses for joining just for an answer to my enquiry! But I'm sure someone here can help point me in the right direction..
A pal of mine who has a used record shop in London has come across a 1/4" tape with Sisters of Mercy written on it and No Time To Cry. We don't know the quality cuz he hasn't a 1/4" tape machine - but is it worth anything?
To me, it's a 1/4" master from a recording studio. Personally, I'd like to know where it was recorded. According to my innernet research, it was prolly produced by ex-Gang of Four's Dave Allen. Am I right?
Any thoughts anyone?
cheerz... crass x
No Time To Cry (master tape?)
- markfiend
- goriller of form 3b
- Posts: 21181
- Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
- Location: st custards
- Contact:
It's probably worth something, aye. I'd imagine there's people willing to pay silly money for a one-of-a-kind Sisters tape like that. What it sounds like is probably a secondary consideration!
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
—Bertrand Russell
markfiend wrote:What it sounds like is probably a secondary consideration!
You need to research if that's a simple stereo recording (not much valuable) or a real, more than 2 channel based multitrack recorded studio tape (that could be a treasure).
At a guess - consideringthis was pre-DAT days in 85 - this type of format, the 1/4" tape would be the master mix off the desk. This would have gone to the pressing plant i guess.
Over the years I have seen many cases of masters not stored correctly. We used to cover them in foil in a cool, dry atmosphere and nowhere near any speakers - otherwise they demagnify and become useless. With this tape - no one has a tape player to test it's condition. Is there anyone one here around London - Essex perhaps who owns a tape machine that will play this? It might be okay...
So where was this recorded?
Over the years I have seen many cases of masters not stored correctly. We used to cover them in foil in a cool, dry atmosphere and nowhere near any speakers - otherwise they demagnify and become useless. With this tape - no one has a tape player to test it's condition. Is there anyone one here around London - Essex perhaps who owns a tape machine that will play this? It might be okay...
So where was this recorded?
DocSommer wrote:markfiend wrote:What it sounds like is probably a secondary consideration!
You need to research if that's a simple stereo recording (not much valuable) or a real, more than 2 channel based multitrack recorded studio tape (that could be a treasure).
- Quiff Boy
- Herr Administrator
- Posts: 16794
- Joined: 25 Jan 2002, 00:00
- Location: Lurking and fixing
- Contact:
mr marx might be able to answer thsi one... i'll drop him a line.crass wrote:At a guess - consideringthis was pre-DAT days in 85 - this type of format, the 1/4" tape would be the master mix off the desk. This would have gone to the pressing plant i guess.
Over the years I have seen many cases of masters not stored correctly. We used to cover them in foil in a cool, dry atmosphere and nowhere near any speakers - otherwise they demagnify and become useless. With this tape - no one has a tape player to test it's condition. Is there anyone one here around London - Essex perhaps who owns a tape machine that will play this? It might be okay...
So where was this recorded?
DocSommer wrote:markfiend wrote:What it sounds like is probably a secondary consideration!
You need to research if that's a simple stereo recording (not much valuable) or a real, more than 2 channel based multitrack recorded studio tape (that could be a treasure).
What’s the difference between a buffalo and a bison?
Well, I did some more research about this 1/4 inch tape stuff and it seems, that this kind of size can only contain 2 channels in a kind of studio quality.
Guess this is not a chance to remix your own sisters single.
Furthermore this tape-size has also been used for semiprofessional or high end home entertainment (e.g. Revox, Telefunken...),
so this also could be just a very simple and homemade vinyl>tape copy.
Another thing is that those tapes aren't sound better over the decades.
I suggest to fake some important look-a-like paper work to prove the authenticity and set the whole thing up to eGay
Guess this is not a chance to remix your own sisters single.
Furthermore this tape-size has also been used for semiprofessional or high end home entertainment (e.g. Revox, Telefunken...),
so this also could be just a very simple and homemade vinyl>tape copy.
Another thing is that those tapes aren't sound better over the decades.
I suggest to fake some important look-a-like paper work to prove the authenticity and set the whole thing up to eGay
It would have been recorded at Strawberry Studios near Manchester. Place famed for Martin Harnett knobwiddling antics. It was produced by David M. Allen - not the guy from Gang of Four.
- smiscandlon
- Overbomber
- Posts: 2595
- Joined: 05 Feb 2004, 23:52
Karst wrote:Place famed for Martin Harnett knobwiddling antics.
анархия
- James Blast
- Banned
- Posts: 24699
- Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 18:58
- Location: back from some place else
sortedKarst wrote:It was produced by David M. Allen - not the guy from the mighty Shriekback.
"And when you start to think about death, you start to think about what's after it. And then you start hoping there is a God. For me, it's a frightening thought to go nowhere".
~ Peter Steele
~ Peter Steele
Not correct. I've got a reel-to-reel machine which takes 1/4 inch tape and one time I was given a collection of tapes from the 1950's and 60's. The oldest was recorded in 1952 and was fantastic quality.DocSommer wrote:Another thing is that those tapes aren't sound better over the decades.
How many home-burnt cd's and dvd's will still be playable in 50 years? I'd say not very many.
thats correct, indeed^^How many home-burnt cd's and dvd's will still be playable in 50 years? I'd say not very many.
A proper storage can decrease the process of aging but I guess those tapes would sound better just after they got recorded - hard to find out^^The oldest was recorded in 1952 and was fantastic quality.
- robertzombie
- Overbomber
- Posts: 4382
- Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 12:49
- Location: London
Any news on this?