As it says
Thanks for your attention.
For trade: Budapest 2009 DVD
- itnAklipse
- Slight Overbomber
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: 09 Jun 2003, 08:12
- Location: set adrift
- Contact:
we've got beer and we've got fuel
check your pm´s please!!
2023: Los Ángeles,Las Vegas, Londonx2, Valencia Madrid, Lisbon, Porto, Bilbao
2024: Gent- Eindhoven - Lokeren - Madrid
2025: London x2
2024: Gent- Eindhoven - Lokeren - Madrid
2025: London x2
Any more infos regarding lineage/runtime?
- itnAklipse
- Slight Overbomber
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: 09 Jun 2003, 08:12
- Location: set adrift
- Contact:
It's complete, about 85 minutes.
Don't know taper/equipment, it's not from a Sisters trader. Easily after your own efforts the best 2009 video i've seen - not perfect but pretty nice. Good sound, too. Focuses on AE all the time, so has lots more closeups of God than most of your videos
Don't know taper/equipment, it's not from a Sisters trader. Easily after your own efforts the best 2009 video i've seen - not perfect but pretty nice. Good sound, too. Focuses on AE all the time, so has lots more closeups of God than most of your videos
we've got beer and we've got fuel
Isn't the drum machine the god part?
Thanks for the info - sounds interesting so i might get back to you via pm during the next days.
Thanks for the info - sounds interesting so i might get back to you via pm during the next days.
- Methedrone
- Amphetamine Filth
- Posts: 155
- Joined: 17 Mar 2006, 14:20
- Location: running around in the radiation
Really? I think you need to see more 2009 vidsitnAklipse wrote:...Easily after your own efforts the best 2009 video i've seen...
Some screens for the curious...oh if only the filmer had been 1ft taller
- itnAklipse
- Slight Overbomber
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: 09 Jun 2003, 08:12
- Location: set adrift
- Contact:
Disagreed, i have most of them - you're free to disagree with my opinion, though. Just don't pretend your opinion is better than mine, dick.Methedrone wrote:Really? I think you need to see more 2009 vids
But thanks for posting the screens - i could've not done that.
we've got beer and we've got fuel
I think it's hard to rate a video because there are many aspects to cosider:
- the "technical" video quality in terms of sharpness, color accuracity, aspect ratio (4:3/16:9), image noise/artefacts
- steadyness
- the ratio between close-ups and long-shots
- any kind of "obstacles" wich are blocking the view like waving hands, heads, too much fog
- audio quality
- DVD authoring
And not to forget:
- how good was the actual concert? A decent recording is not much worth if the actual show was lame.
I think these are the most important criterias wich can't be weightened in a certain way. Most people have (probably) different expectations about these aspects. For my taste I'd weight a vid sort of like this:
30% audio quality
20% good show?
20% steadyness,
10% close-up/long-shot ratio
10% technical
10% obstacles
=100% MotherFucker
- the "technical" video quality in terms of sharpness, color accuracity, aspect ratio (4:3/16:9), image noise/artefacts
- steadyness
- the ratio between close-ups and long-shots
- any kind of "obstacles" wich are blocking the view like waving hands, heads, too much fog
- audio quality
- DVD authoring
And not to forget:
- how good was the actual concert? A decent recording is not much worth if the actual show was lame.
I think these are the most important criterias wich can't be weightened in a certain way. Most people have (probably) different expectations about these aspects. For my taste I'd weight a vid sort of like this:
30% audio quality
20% good show?
20% steadyness,
10% close-up/long-shot ratio
10% technical
10% obstacles
=100% MotherFucker
- itnAklipse
- Slight Overbomber
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: 09 Jun 2003, 08:12
- Location: set adrift
- Contact:
Indeed
London93 vs. Hamburg09 came to mind for some reason.. (This is technically better than London93, though, which at times is frustratingly shaky - and yet in that case i don't really mind.)
London93 vs. Hamburg09 came to mind for some reason.. (This is technically better than London93, though, which at times is frustratingly shaky - and yet in that case i don't really mind.)
we've got beer and we've got fuel
Yeah - Hamburg 09 was tragic^^
- Methedrone
- Amphetamine Filth
- Posts: 155
- Joined: 17 Mar 2006, 14:20
- Location: running around in the radiation
itnAklipse wrote:Disagreed, i have most of them - you're free to disagree with my opinion, though. Just don't pretend your opinion is better than mine, dick.Methedrone wrote:Really? I think you need to see more 2009 vids
You're welcome. Have some more...these are probably more indicative of the camerawork bearing in mind the filmers position.itnAklipse wrote:But thanks for posting the screens - i could've not done that.
Wich tool are you using for making these screener overviews?
- itnAklipse
- Slight Overbomber
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: 09 Jun 2003, 08:12
- Location: set adrift
- Contact:
Never mind. Maybe i took what M said in slightly wrong way. Sorry, M.
we've got beer and we've got fuel