Page 6 of 6
Posted: 22 May 2009, 12:37
by markfiend
mh wrote:No joking, the two boys have been the best thing that's happed to the band in a long long long time.
Yep. While I wouldn't say that the Hussbag is a c*nt, (indeed he seems an awfully nice chap these days) he needs Eldritch
far more than Eldritch needs him.
Posted: 22 May 2009, 12:46
by Debi
markfiend wrote:mh wrote:No joking, the two boys have been the best thing that's happed to the band in a long long long time.
Yep. While I wouldn't say that the Hussbag is a c*nt, (indeed he seems an awfully nice chap these days) he needs Eldritch
far more than Eldritch needs him.
indeedy
Posted: 22 May 2009, 12:55
by markfiend
Just a thought: I wonder whether Wayne reads these forums?
Posted: 22 May 2009, 12:59
by Debi
markfiend wrote:Just a thought: I wonder whether Wayne reads these forums?
who is Wayne
Posted: 22 May 2009, 17:08
by lachert
markfiend wrote:Just a thought: I wonder whether Wayne reads these forums?
yeah, he's that kind of guy. he put some nice dress, deep purple lipstick and read it loud
reunion:
Posted: 22 May 2009, 17:37
by stufarq
markfiend wrote:Yep. While I wouldn't say that the Hussbag is a c*nt, (indeed he seems an awfully nice chap these days) he needs Eldritch far more than Eldritch needs him.
Hardly. We know which one has actually continued to make records and show a modicum of interest in his fanbase.
I'm not saying that Eldritch needs Wayne but Wayne certainly doesn't need Eldritch.
Posted: 22 May 2009, 19:28
by lachert
stufarq wrote:markfiend wrote:Yep. While I wouldn't say that the Hussbag is a c*nt, (indeed he seems an awfully nice chap these days) he needs Eldritch far more than Eldritch needs him.
Hardly. We know which one has actually continued to make records and show a modicum of interest in his fanbase.
I'm not saying that Eldritch needs Wayne but Wayne certainly doesn't need Eldritch.
records? quality not quantity. fans? i know few m*****n fans but they are not so mind open bright ones
it isn't even close to the few sisters records and fanbase
Posted: 22 May 2009, 20:18
by eotunun
stufarq wrote:markfiend wrote:Yep. While I wouldn't say that the Hussbag is a c*nt, (indeed he seems an awfully nice chap these days) he needs Eldritch far more than Eldritch needs him.
Hardly. We know which one has actually continued to make records and show a modicum of interest in his fanbase.
I'm not saying that Eldritch needs Wayne but Wayne certainly doesn't need Eldritch.
There are some dead horses with flogging marks on them in The m*****n's stable, I wouldn't say Wayne doesn't need someone.
Seriously: What a scene that would be! Wayne on the guitar, playing This Corrosion.
Or can you immagine a jangly mucho chorussed 12 string playing Vision Thing? -Surely it would wet some oldtimer's eyes if Wayne guest starred for some classics, but I would neither want Ben nor Chris to have their efforts dissreguarded and to have to stand back for someone who's contributions mainly are a historical note.
Posted: 22 May 2009, 22:38
by _emma_
stufarq wrote:Hardly. We know which one has actually continued to make records and show a modicum of interest in his fanbase.
Yup. So what? Are those criteria that determine quality to you?
Posted: 22 May 2009, 22:54
by mh
eotunun wrote:I would neither want Ben nor Chris to have their efforts dissreguarded and to have to stand back for someone who's contributions mainly are a historical note.
Preach it brother!
Now Gary and Craig on the other hand would have me squealing like a 12 year old at a Take That instore signing.
Posted: 23 May 2009, 15:39
by stufarq
_emma_ wrote:stufarq wrote:Hardly. We know which one has actually continued to make records and show a modicum of interest in his fanbase.
Yup. So what? Are those criteria that determine quality to you?
No but that's not the point. Quality is purely a matter of opinion. Regardless of any individual's perception of quality, Wayne has been doing fine for many years and doesn't
need Eldritch. Just as Eldritch doesn't need him. If they chose to work together again it might be interesting for both them and us but neither
needs the other.
Posted: 23 May 2009, 16:22
by Garbageman
The past is the past.
Posted: 23 May 2009, 19:25
by _emma_
stufarq wrote:Quality is purely a matter of opinion.
In most cases, yes. But let's compare, say, a 20 year old S-class Mercedes with a 20 year old Dacia...
Posted: 24 May 2009, 14:50
by stufarq
_emma_ wrote:stufarq wrote:Quality is purely a matter of opinion.
In most cases, yes. But let's compare, say, a 20 year old S-class Mercedes with a 20 year old Dacia...
The Merc I'm comparing has rust all over the bodywork, genuine 1979 furry dice and smells of something that definitely isn't new car.
The 20 year old Dacian is Alexandra Maria Lara.
Posted: 24 May 2009, 17:29
by James Blast
Quiff Boy wrote:there are also a few people who have custom/personal 'ranks' but you'd have to be a regular to warrant one of those
can I have a word about this?
Quiff Boy wrote:Debi wrote:"Intellectual Love God 15000 - 14999 posts"
yeah - whats the point in being intellectual or a love God if you've got no spare time cos you are glued to a forum!!!
ooooh, controversial
can I have several words about this?
Posted: 24 May 2009, 21:30
by jost 7
i hope both of them don't read some posts in here as they are far below the intellectual lovegods' little universe ...
finally all in here would enjoy seeing them work together (which would cause especially one of these two to work beside the tourthing ...)
Posted: 24 May 2009, 21:48
by James Blast
thank you jost I was going to post something along those lines, youth and young wo(man)hood dinna ken just how much time can heal
sometimes it's really grand tae meet up with auld compadres and enemies, we can at least compare the same battle scars, the wounds are healed and the guid times live on
"Jerry Lovelock and Andrew Taylor present an evening of their back catalogue inna acoustic stylee with slide show and chat about their 'White Line Fever' days" does not snoud like a bad nicht oot and I'd buy a ticket for that more than I'd buy one for another TSOM-2000+ gig
Posted: 26 May 2009, 14:21
by Aazhyd
Even if this did happen (which it won´t), the renewed cooperation would be very short lived. Each musician doing his own thing in the studio, indepently and never at the same time, would be the best way to actually be able to record anything.
All I have to add is: TWO FIVE ZERO ZERO ZERO.
Posted: 26 May 2009, 15:40
by Debi
James Blast wrote:Quiff Boy wrote:there are also a few people who have custom/personal 'ranks' but you'd have to be a regular to warrant one of those
can I have a word about this?
Quiff Boy wrote:Debi wrote:"Intellectual Love God 15000 - 14999 posts"
yeah - whats the point in being intellectual or a love God if you've got no spare time cos you are glued to a forum!!!
ooooh, controversial
can I have several words about this?
i think that you should save the time and concentrate on the love god bit
Posted: 27 May 2009, 10:03
by mistressteal
Aazhyd wrote:Even if this did happen (which it won´t), the renewed cooperation would be very short lived. Each musician doing his own thing in the studio, indepently and never at the same time, would be the best way to actually be able to record anything.
All I have to add is: TWO FIVE ZERO ZERO ZERO.
Sounds like a fun evening, will they serve mulled wine?
Posted: 27 May 2009, 10:13
by Debi
mistressteal wrote:Aazhyd wrote:Even if this did happen (which it won´t), the renewed cooperation would be very short lived. Each musician doing his own thing in the studio, indepently and never at the same time, would be the best way to actually be able to record anything.
All I have to add is: TWO FIVE ZERO ZERO ZERO.
Sounds like a fun evening, will they serve mulled wine?
and canapes?
Posted: 05 Jun 2009, 12:49
by JRoberto
We can debate and argue as much as we can, using whatever the media serve us (90% of it just to stirr the s**t and whatch the circus go up in flames) and it will never reflect what the relationship between two given people is in reality.
Posted: 05 Jun 2009, 14:45
by _emma_
JRoberto wrote:We can debate and argue as much as we can, using whatever the media serve us (90% of it just to stirr the s**t and whatch the circus go up in flames) and it will never reflect what the relationship between two given people is in reality.
True, true!
I'll add - sometimes two given people can't really tell themselves what the relatioship between them is in reality, so what can a third party know? Nothing at all.
Posted: 05 Jun 2009, 17:39
by James Blast
and time wounds all heels
Posted: 05 Jun 2009, 18:41
by _emma_