Page 2 of 3
Posted: 12 Jul 2009, 16:00
by stufarq
7anthea7 wrote:In Classic Rock 134, Von wrote:We don't have a Myspace page and we're not on Facebook. We're perfectly capable of running a website, thank you very much, and we don't cherish that mock-interaction with the fans. We're not at pains to explain ourselves
Now
that sounds more like the Von we all know and by whom we are eternally frustrated, yes?
And I fully support him on that one. They're all rubbish. And they inflicted the Arctic Monkeys on us.
Posted: 12 Jul 2009, 21:28
by _emma_
stufarq wrote:_emma_, I'm not saying that the band should or shouldn't be here or that they should communicate in a particular way. (...)
It doesn't bother me as such, I just think it's silly to make statements like that when they're demostrably untrue.
I know.
Your previous post just made me think about it aloud, that's all.
Posted: 13 Jul 2009, 09:47
by Debi
7anthea7 wrote:Debi wrote:Debi wrote:oh F*CK, wheres Mark when i need him
again
whats wrong with me today
thank christ its friday, me tinks i require a large white one
Big Fat Hint:
Preview before posting.
But have a large white one anyway.
yes, really should preview - thanks for reminding
and yes i did indeed have some of my favourite weekend treats of wine, curry, fish and chocolate mousse
Posted: 13 Jul 2009, 21:13
by sultan2075
That beard is great: it makes him look thuggish and crude (which is amusing, and probably the point, since he's really neither).
Posted: 14 Jul 2009, 19:06
by _emma_
God I'm so glad to have grown out of caring about what he looks like.
Posted: 14 Jul 2009, 21:30
by 7anthea7
_emma_ wrote:God I'm so glad to have grown out of caring about what he looks like.
Makes his recent sartorial choices considerably more tolerable, dunnit?
Posted: 14 Jul 2009, 23:27
by stufarq
_emma_ wrote:stufarq wrote:_emma_, I'm not saying that the band should or shouldn't be here or that they should communicate in a particular way. (...)
It doesn't bother me as such, I just think it's silly to make statements like that when they're demostrably untrue.
I know.
Your previous post just made me think about it aloud, that's all.
Fair enough. Though how you can think out loud on an online forum is beyond me.
Posted: 21 Jul 2009, 20:27
by itnAklipse
stufarq wrote:Von wrote:It's much easier to be a band with the Internet cos you can talk directly to people.
Are they gonna start doing that then?
Notice knobhead: he didn't say "fans". He said people. i am sure he talks to a lot of people in the net - also of things regarding the band.
i think this thread is a good example of many many reasons not to bother with this place. For anyone.
Posted: 21 Jul 2009, 21:22
by lachert
itnAklipse wrote:stufarq wrote:Von wrote:It's much easier to be a band with the Internet cos you can talk directly to people.
Are they gonna start doing that then?
Notice knobhead: he didn't say "fans". He said people. i am sure he talks to a lot of people in the net - also of things regarding the band.
i think this thread is a good example of many many reasons not to bother with this place. For anyone.
fans are alsow people, sometimes they read too much "the catcher in the rye" maybe, and if you're such superstar as andrew, you can be affraid for sure, but internet is rather safe place. otherwise, i don't imagine that andrew's posting here, with all that horny chicks out there
this is a nice place, people play nice here, (maybe except mr blast
) so i don't see any problems with hl. maybe i'm a lucky one.
the thing is, not to take this band too serious. if you want give your money to andrew, just do it, free will
Posted: 21 Jul 2009, 21:44
by Being645
itnAklipse wrote:stufarq wrote:Von wrote:It's much easier to be a band with the Internet cos you can talk directly to people.
Are they gonna start doing that then?
Notice knobhead: he didn't say "fans". He said people. i am sure he talks to a lot of people in the net - also of things regarding the band.
... fair enough for a discerning Sister's Reptile ...
...
itnAklipse wrote:
i think this thread is a good example of many many reasons not to bother with this place. For anyone.
I see, you've survived it in a good mood of kicking ... What else do you need for your entertainment?
And as to those ...
horny chicks ... You're perfectly right,
lachert: ... the thing is, not to take things too serious ...
...
Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 00:57
by stufarq
itnAklipse wrote:stufarq wrote:Von wrote:It's much easier to be a band with the Internet cos you can talk directly to people.
Are they gonna start doing that then?
Notice knobhead: he didn't say "fans". He said people. i am sure he talks to a lot of people in the net - also of things regarding the band.
i think this thread is a good example of many many reasons not to bother with this place. For anyone.
Thgen why do you? Is it just so you can call people names and show off your social skills?
Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 09:26
by Debi
itnAklipse wrote:stufarq wrote:Von wrote:It's much easier to be a band with the Internet cos you can talk directly to people.
Are they gonna start doing that then?
Notice knobhead: he didn't say "fans". He said people. i am sure he talks to a lot of people in the net - also of things regarding the band.
i think this thread is a good example of many many reasons not to bother with this place. For anyone.
dont then.
your choice.
Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 09:28
by Moakahontas
I like the new interview a lot..
Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 13:07
by Being645
Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 13:41
by Moakahontas
Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 15:01
by _emma_
Yep, page no 2 of that interview is the best.
Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 15:56
by Being645
Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 16:17
by Moakahontas
For me he looks quite younger without any beard than with this...hair in the face...*urks*
Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 17:04
by Bartek
you got your thread about
and hair or lack of it.
Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 17:20
by Moakahontas
Bartek wrote:you got your thread about
and hair or lack of it.
I know!
Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 18:23
by Being645
Bartek wrote:you got your thread about
and hair or lack of it.
... we're talking about these interviews ... and their contents ...
...
certain things - especially those in steady development - oughta be mentioned, time and again ...
Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 18:53
by Moakahontas
Being645 wrote:Bartek wrote:you got your thread about
and hair or lack of it.
... we're talking about these interviews ... and their contents ...
...
certain things - especially those in steady development - oughta be mentioned, time and again ...
Japps..the interview..especially page 2 is
very interesting..so many facts, so much to know..
Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 22:27
by robertzombie
Video's not loading
Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 22:47
by Being645
robertzombie wrote:Video's not loading
yep, certain things are simply ...
very, very boring ...
Posted: 23 Jul 2009, 06:58
by Moakahontas
robertzombie wrote:Video's not loading
It tooks about a minute..just wait a little..press play and then..wait..it works then...
