Page 2 of 5

Posted: 20 Oct 2003, 00:18
by Black Planet
Dan wrote:
Chairman Bux wrote:I like Andrew because he's charming, witty, debonair, a snappy dresser, a wonderful human being and an even better lover.
And you have personal experience of this, yes?
:notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy:

Nice, very nice Dan!!!

:innocent: :von: :innocent: :von:

Posted: 21 Oct 2003, 17:39
by Chairman Bux
Dan wrote:
Chairman Bux wrote:I like Andrew because he's charming, witty, debonair, a snappy dresser, a wonderful human being and an even better lover.
And you have personal experience of this, yes?
One has to keep one's self occupied during those long, cold and lonely winter nights "oop north".

Posted: 21 Oct 2003, 19:24
by Dan
Ok, nobody's dared say this yet, so someone might as well...

<puts Sherlock Holmes hat on>
Chairman Bux wrote:
Dan wrote:
Chairman Bux wrote:I like Andrew because he's charming, witty, debonair, a snappy dresser, a wonderful human being and an even better lover.
And you have personal experience of this, yes?
One has to keep one's self occupied during those long, cold and lonely winter nights "oop north".
So one would conclude, also bearing in mind your other posts, that you are Andrew Eldritch and I claim my £5. (Either that or someone pretending to be him.)

BUT, there's also a post on this page here-
Quiff Boy wrote: i gather that eldritch is aware of this site though i dont know to what extent.

certainly other people within the sisters camp, that are also close to von, have seen this site and browsed it's contents (i know this for a fact) but none of them are registered here. that i know of. so far.
As the Chairman is a moderator in the Sisters forum (at least I think he is, or was), then he must be known to Quiffy. But we have this-
Quiff Boy wrote: i gather that eldritch is aware of this site though i dont know to what extent.
Which would mean the Chairman isn't Von after all.

Now we have everyone assembled here I will now reveal that I've never seen the Chairman and Quiffy online at the same time. In fact, on some occasions one has been online, then left, only to be replaced by the other moments later. I can only conclude that the Chairman is...













(drum roll)













... Quiff Boy himself!





Ayethangyow!

Posted: 21 Oct 2003, 19:30
by Quiff Boy
:roll:

http://www.myheartland.co.uk/statistics.php

Code: Select all

 Chairman Bux       Tue 21 Oct, 2003 5&#58;14 pm 
 Quiff Boy          Tue 21 Oct, 2003 5&#58;14 pm 
close, but no cowboy hat and sunglasses... :innocent:

Posted: 21 Oct 2003, 19:33
by Quiff Boy
Dan wrote:
Quiff Boy wrote: i gather that eldritch is aware of this site though i dont know to what extent.

certainly other people within the sisters camp, that are also close to von, have seen this site and browsed it's contents (i know this for a fact) but none of them are registered here. that i know of. so far.
As the Chairman is a moderator in the Sisters forum (at least I think he is, or was), then he must be known to Quiffy. But we have this-
Quiff Boy wrote: i gather that eldritch is aware of this site though i dont know to what extent.
Which would mean the Chairman isn't Von after all.
misinformation is a wonderful tool isn't it? ;)

Posted: 21 Oct 2003, 19:36
by Dan
Quiff Boy wrote::roll:

http://www.myheartland.co.uk/statistics.php

Code: Select all

 Chairman Bux       Tue 21 Oct, 2003 5&#58;14 pm 
 Quiff Boy          Tue 21 Oct, 2003 5&#58;14 pm 
close, but no cowboy hat and sunglasses... :innocent:
Both logged in at the same time. Very telling :)

Posted: 21 Oct 2003, 19:37
by Dan
Quiff Boy wrote: close, but no cowboy hat and sunglasses... :innocent:
Or alternatively...

If it's not you, it must be the real Eldritch!

Posted: 21 Oct 2003, 20:26
by Black Planet
LOL See...I am not the only one here who thinks Von is lurking among us!!!!!!!

:):):)

Posted: 15 Dec 2004, 04:27
by Elektra_byron
Black Planet wrote:
Dan wrote:
Chairman Bux wrote:I like Andrew because he's charming, witty, debonair, a snappy dresser, a wonderful human being and an even better lover.
And you have personal experience of this, yes?
:notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy:

Nice, very nice Dan!!!

:innocent: :von: :innocent: :von:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Posted: 15 Dec 2004, 14:30
by Guest
One reason I love Andrew:

Image

Posted: 15 Dec 2004, 16:07
by Thea
villageidiot wrote:One reason I love Andrew:

Image
His lovley sofa?Image

Posted: 15 Dec 2004, 16:18
by markfiend
Hey everyone, look at Andreas's socks! (Well, sock) :lol:

I'm not sure why I thought that was funny now.

Posted: 15 Dec 2004, 16:53
by Thea
markfiend wrote:Hey everyone, look at Andreas's socks! (Well, sock) :lol:

I'm not sure why I thought that was funny now.
:lol:
He's a good lad taking off his shoes when he goes indoors - look at the rest of 'em! shoes all over the lovley new sofa :eek:

Posted: 15 Dec 2004, 17:06
by markfiend
You can't see :von:'s feet in the picture. Perhaps he's in his socks too. ;D

Although to be honest I think he's got his socks stuck down the front of his trousers :innocent:

Posted: 15 Dec 2004, 17:13
by Guest
markfiend wrote:You can't see :von:'s feet in the picture. Perhaps he's in his socks too. ;D

Although to be honest I think he's got his socks stuck down the front of his trousers :innocent:
You know better than that I said :von:

No he does not!!!!!!

Posted: 15 Dec 2004, 17:32
by Thea
Theory 2: It's a game of "Hide Andreas's shoes"... :innocent:

Posted: 15 Dec 2004, 17:38
by Elektra_byron
markfiend wrote:You can't see :von:'s feet in the picture. Perhaps he's in his socks too. ;D

;D :lol: :lol: :notworthy: God, I really love this forum already!!!!!!!!


Although to be honest I think he's got his socks stuck down the front of his trousers :innocent:

Posted: 16 Dec 2004, 11:50
by MrChris
I'm not sure the infamous love monster is all he's cracked up to be, if you can judge by the topographics of that particular pair of trousers...

Posted: 16 Dec 2004, 12:14
by Elektra_byron
MrChris wrote:I'm not sure the infamous love monster is all he's cracked up to be, if you can judge by the topographics of that particular pair of trousers...
You are so naughty!!!!! :lol: :lol: :oops:

Posted: 16 Dec 2004, 14:39
by Petseri
villageidiot wrote:One reason I love Andrew:
So, this photo is something which you can find right away. :wink:

Posted: 16 Dec 2004, 14:51
by _emma_
Well. Suppose it's just the photo and the love monster is in reality not much of a monster. Suppose Andrew is reading this. Suppose his self-esteem is as high as it is generally believed to be... he must have a rather low opinion of some of the comments made here. :roll:

Have I become Amphetamine Filth now? :P

Posted: 16 Dec 2004, 14:52
by Guest
Petseri wrote:
villageidiot wrote:One reason I love Andrew:
So, this photo is something which you can find right away. :wink:
:eek: :eek:

Erm, yes it is. :twisted:

Posted: 16 Dec 2004, 15:15
by Elektra_byron
_emma_ wrote:Well. Suppose it's just the photo and the love monster is in reality not much of a monster. Suppose Andrew is reading this. Suppose his self-esteem is as high as it is generally believed to be... he must have a rather low opinion of some of the comments made here. :roll: :P
But he is also probably quite flattered that so many girls are lusting after him! do you however seriously think that he is so bored to look here at all?

Posted: 16 Dec 2004, 15:30
by MrChris
Some people here have implied in the past that he is an occasional visitor. They have implied that they know something the rest of us poor mortals don't. They have not named names, but have exchanged knowing winks. I suspect They will not say any more, however much we threaten to kick Their shins.

Posted: 16 Dec 2004, 15:42
by RicheyJames
but who are they? do they know that they are them? can anyone become one of them? how do we know that you're not one of them spreading disinformation?

i'm sorry. of course you're not one of us... err... i mean them. but to answer the question - yes, of course von is aware of this site and of course he checks in from time to time. it's all rather obvious if you look at it in the right way and disregard the more obvious mis-direction and red herrings. and how else would he know that his pension plan is still secure?