Posted: 20 Jan 2004, 12:34
Just got it down to 6:44. This is great! Anyone for 6:30???
zigeunerweisen wrote:I agree that 10 minutes of it is a little too much.mh wrote:I've made my own 6:59 edit without all the nonsense in as I described above, and it's major rocking cool. Sometimes you can have too much of a good thing.
ever fancied mixing it (badly) with an aerosmith track?mh wrote:@claws:
The choir at the start is fully intact.
From there, I've cut some of the beats and the "gimme gimme gimme the ring" bits, so the first verse comes in at about 0:50.
Then entire bit between the first and second verses has been dropped, and replaced with the chorus from after the second verse. The second verse now begins at the 2:20 mark.
This leaves the fade out starting after the first couple of "like a healing hands", about 6:20, and going to 6:44.
So unless you consider "gimme gimme gimme the ring now now now now" to be a vital part of the song, nothing essential has been cut. All the lyrics are fully intact, no cut-up lyrics, nothing like that.
It should be possible to get it to 6:15 or so by fading out quicker and dropping the repeat of the chorus before "I got nothing to say".
Why??? What is wrong with you guys? When is *shorter* *better*???????Scardwel wrote:I wish someone would do the same with "More" - the album version tends to go on too long, but the 7" edit is too short...
claws wrote:Shorter is better if it captures all the essential parts and not being long-winded. For example I like the Floodland version of "Lucretia my reflection" better than the ASCOOB version for this reason.
Scardwel wrote:Lucretia is a different kettle of fish altogether - I love the long versions of this song (it's my favourite track off of Floodland). The CD single version is the best, clocking in at 9 mins 52 secs (the one on ASCOOB is shorter, ending at 8 min 43 secs.)
Nah, he's much better with a beard!Black Planet wrote:Oh and yes one last.....
<------- Isn't he dreamy without his shades?
BP *swoons*
Here's another oneBlack Planet wrote:Scardwel wrote:Lucretia is a different kettle of fish altogether - I love the long versions of this song (it's my favourite track off of Floodland). The CD single version is the best, clocking in at 9 mins 52 secs (the one on ASCOOB is shorter, ending at 8 min 43 secs.)
Wow, someone who likes Lucretia.
and another. the 12" version is sublime...pikkrong wrote:Here's another oneBlack Planet wrote:Scardwel wrote:Lucretia is a different kettle of fish altogether - I love the long versions of this song (it's my favourite track off of Floodland). The CD single version is the best, clocking in at 9 mins 52 secs (the one on ASCOOB is shorter, ending at 8 min 43 secs.)
Wow, someone who likes Lucretia.
Well, I've always stated a preference for the 7" Temple Of Love (original, not 92).Black Planet wrote:Why??? What is wrong with you guys? When is *shorter* *better*???????
Couldn't agree more!!!Black Planet wrote:More in it's 8 minute version is Wonderful!
I just don't necessarily love everything he's done, that's all.Black Planet wrote:I just don't get it. Andrew has a vision, and a sound running through his head. He records it in all its glory, and you guys want it shorter?
I'd really love to you know. I do think it's a definite improvement. The song seems to me to be making it's point in a more concise manner without any of the extra waffle, and with nothing essential lost. I'd also love to make it generally available to people on here so we could get an overall opinion, but I don't really see that being possible.Black Planet wrote:Which one of you would tell him that to his face? Who would send him your remix with a nice polite note stating hey, mate I think is a better mix, let's record it soon.??