Wembley 90 x2 = OK

Glasgow '03 = Pish


Leeds '06 = OK

Glasgow '06 = OK

Our Taylor is Rich wrote:24.11.90 london wembley arena
26.11.90 london wembley arena
bad voice, bad concerts, bad guys, that was enough for me : I decided that I will never see the Andrew Eldritch Gangswar on stage anymore...
Better gigs on the mainland?scotty wrote:I've been to Five SISTERS gigs:
Wembley 90 x2 = OK![]()
Glasgow '03 = Pish![]()
![]()
Leeds '06 = OK![]()
Glasgow '06 = OK
After reading this statement, celibacy sounds like a lovely night out!Psy wrote:Been a fan since '85, bought all the records, wore the t-shirts yet never saw them liveI know I will. Someday...
I thought the 2006 was the better of the 2 - the 2003 is one of the worst I've ever seen.. Guess it all depends on where you are watching fromPipoTheClown wrote: Amsterdam 2003 - pffffffffffff
Amsterdam 2006 - really, really, I mean REALLY bad
Absolutely - I thought 03 was bloody ace. How much of that had to do with it coming after a weekend in town is debatable. However, everyone in our group loved it, and simillarly the same folk present at Leeds 06 thought it sucked a big one. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, or something.czuczu wrote:I thought the 2006 was the better of the 2 - the 2003 is one of the worst I've ever seen.. Guess it all depends on where you are watching fromPipoTheClown wrote: Amsterdam 2003 - pffffffffffff
Amsterdam 2006 - really, really, I mean REALLY bad
Damn right it does!Wish wrote:three. but i was in my moms tum and unborn. does that count?
I had booked my flight to the UK more than half a year before Feb 12 because I was sure there would be the anniversary gig... somewhere in England. I was quite p!ssed off when I knew that Las Vegas (about what they announced meanwhile) means really Las VegasSINsister wrote:pikkrong wrote:only 21 Sisters gigs before this summer. the best moments for me - Austin 2006 and Hamburg 2006 (Robochrist as the support act). San Diego, Krakow and Budapest 2006 come close.
You were in the U.S. last year and you didn't stop by Chicago? WTF?
![]()
The 2003 gig was f**king great to me! When I listen to this very good recording I relive it. It was great with a legendary version of Burn.Planet Dave wrote:Absolutely - I thought 03 was bloody ace. How much of that had to do with it coming after a weekend in town is debatable. However, everyone in our group loved it, and simillarly the same folk present at Leeds 06 thought it sucked a big one. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, or something.czuczu wrote:I thought the 2006 was the better of the 2 - the 2003 is one of the worst I've ever seen.. Guess it all depends on where you are watching fromPipoTheClown wrote: Amsterdam 2003 - pffffffffffff
Amsterdam 2006 - really, really, I mean REALLY bad
This is why you don't believe what people who "know more" know, and realise that the announced tour date is not a hidden message or lyric to be dissected, it really is a venue.pikkrong wrote:I was sure there would be the anniversary gig... somewhere in England. I was quite p!ssed off when I knew that Las Vegas (about what they announced meanwhile) means really Las Vegas
this is where you're wrong you see. 'we' knew about celebrity plane crash over a week in advance 'we' spread the word to people 'we' thought should knowDark wrote:This is why you don't believe what people who "know more" know, and realise that the announced tour date is not a hidden message or lyric to be dissected, it really is a venue.pikkrong wrote:I was sure there would be the anniversary gig... somewhere in England. I was quite p!ssed off when I knew that Las Vegas (about what they announced meanwhile) means really Las Vegas
But at least you won't be doing that again.
why such loud mumbles?Ozpat wrote:The 2003 gig was f**king great to me! When I listen to this very good recording I relive it. It was great with a legendary version of Burn.