Posted: 12 Jan 2004, 16:33
like i said, neither is wrong per se but "stupidest" would probably have been more elegant in this context...
The Sisters of Mercy Forum
https://myheartland.co.uk/
RJ you have never had an "imho" in your life, many, too many "imo's" though.RicheyJames wrote:all this is, as ever, imho, but i hope it is of some help.
Not sure I agree with you. I'd argue for "more stupid" and "most stupid" ahead of "stupider" and "stupidest".RicheyJames wrote:like i said, neither is wrong per se but "stupidest" would probably have been more elegant in this context...
well i was merely following convention in pointing out that i don't claim to be an authority on the matter under discussion. and imnvho just looks silly.Red Sunsets wrote:RJ you have never had an "imho" in your life, many, too many "imo's" though.
well i'm sticking to my guns on this one. in fact, i think, the comparative actually looks clumsier than the superlative.andymackem wrote:Not sure I agree with you. I'd argue for "more stupid" and "most stupid" ahead of "stupider" and "stupidest".
i don't think "stupider" and "stupidest" are particularly cumbersome. my personal rule of thumb is to use suffixes unless the adjective in question has more that two syllables. obviously there are times when this is still not appropriate (eg "cleverer" looks particularly awful) but i don't think "stupid" is a case in point.I recognise the usual formation of comparative and superlative adjectives, but in this instance we get cumbersome, ugly-sounding words. "Stupider" sounds particularly bad (go on, say it), and your argument implies an endorsement of it. Therefore on style grounds I'd go for more and most here.
i'm not sure there are hard and fast rules on this which is why i indicated that i believed neither usage to be incorrect. it is interesting though that the point was first raised by ziggy who, as a non-native speaker, appears to have been taught to use suffixes to form comparatives and superlatives wherever possible. would that be right ziggy?Not sure whether this is a matter of linguistic precision or personal taste, though. I'm lacking most of my relevant tomes of reference.
harking back to the day when word count was all. I would use stupidest, then you could drop "most"RicheyJames wrote:well i'm sticking to my guns on this one. in fact, i think, the comparative actually looks clumsier than the superlative.andymackem wrote:Not sure I agree with you. I'd argue for "more stupid" and "most stupid" ahead of "stupider" and "stupidest".
i don't think "stupider" and "stupidest" are particularly cumbersome. my personal rule of thumb is to use suffixes unless the adjective in question has more that two syllables. obviously there are times when this is still not appropriate (eg "cleverer" looks particularly awful) but i don't think "stupid" is a case in point.I recognise the usual formation of comparative and superlative adjectives, but in this instance we get cumbersome, ugly-sounding words. "Stupider" sounds particularly bad (go on, say it), and your argument implies an endorsement of it. Therefore on style grounds I'd go for more and most here.
i'm not sure there are hard and fast rules on this which is why i indicated that i believed neither usage to be incorrect. it is interesting though that the point was first raised by ziggy who, as a non-native speaker, appears to have been taught to use suffixes to form comparatives and superlatives wherever possible. would that be right ziggy?Not sure whether this is a matter of linguistic precision or personal taste, though. I'm lacking most of my relevant tomes of reference.
Uhhh... yeah... sure... that's it... *cough*RicheyJames wrote: as a non-native speaker, appears to have been taught to use suffixes to form comparatives and superlatives wherever possible. would that be right ziggy?
no need to explain better ziggy, it's enough that you agree with mezigeunerweisen wrote:To be honest i can't tell you exactly how i was taught to use suffixes in english, as it was a looong time ago, but it got stuck with me and now i instinctively know which one to use.
It's kind of hard to explain but if i said "most stupid" instead of "stupidest" it would just sound grammatically wrong to me. Sorry i can't explain better than this.
I waited until I was 22, which was a lot more stupid really as by then I knew what I was doing & still did it anyway.Thrash Harry wrote:Taking up smoking at age 10.
paint it black wrote: harking back to the day when word count was all. I would use stupidest, then you could drop "most"
Right, I know this is a reply from two pages ago, but having done more research (ie. asking my Dad) the real story is this:mugabe wrote:They were arc-welding wearing boots with exposed steel toe-caps in a metal floored area, and he accidentally attached the cable to his boot, knelt and hit the toe-cap with the electrode and kept it there long enough for it to get welded stuck, and repeated the procedure with the other boot?markfiend wrote:DIY story: My dad's first job after leaving school was as an arc-welder. One of his colleagues managed to weld his own steel toe-cap boots to the floor.
You are a nasty Heartlanderpaint it black wrote:Put a pin prick in the side of a coke tin, just under where you drink from. then sit back and laugh at their inability to drink without spilling it over
themselves