Posted: 01 May 2011, 19:48
Aazhyd wrote:Why do we keep buying the same albums over and over again?
Page 4 of 6
Posted: 01 May 2011, 20:10
Because we have to ...Aazhyd wrote:Why do we keep buying the same albums over and over again?
Posted: 01 May 2011, 21:23
...paul wrote:Because we have to ...Aazhyd wrote:Why do we keep buying the same albums over and over again?
... and I really look forward to it ... my old one has been played so often ...Posted: 02 May 2011, 18:46
Lack of alternatives?Aazhyd wrote:Why do we keep buying the same albums over and over again?
Posted: 02 May 2011, 19:52
Sounds totally right for meVonOben wrote:Lack of alternatives?Aazhyd wrote:Why do we keep buying the same albums over and over again?
Posted: 02 May 2011, 19:52
Received today!
Posted: 03 May 2011, 09:14
Anyone care to post an audio sample? 
Posted: 03 May 2011, 20:15
I think that's not an easy task without a decent record player and some high res recording chain.robertzombie wrote:Anyone care to post an audio sample?
Posted: 03 May 2011, 21:25
I have both. But I don't have the record. Yet.DocSommer wrote:I think that's not an easy task without a decent record player and some high res recording chain.
(And I really should get going on the Shot thing instead.)
Posted: 04 May 2011, 18:19
On a related note. Is it better to record vinyl to PC using USB or a phono to jack adaptor?DocSommer wrote:I think that's not an easy task without a decent record player and some high res recording chain.robertzombie wrote:Anyone care to post an audio sample?
Posted: 04 May 2011, 21:22
I'm not sure what you're really asking here. But you'll need a a good record player, an ok riia-amp and a decent sound card. It doesn't matter if the sound card is internal or usb as long as it's a good card.robertzombie wrote:On a related note. Is it better to record vinyl to PC using USB or a phono to jack adaptor?
A second hand M-Audio Transit is a wonderful USB card to use for this kind of thing.
I myself will not use a PC, but a Samson SD-card recorder. That's a simple way to avoid some background noise related to different ground potentials.
Posted: 10 May 2011, 18:50
It's beeing transfered as I write.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8582653/2011-05 ... .41.42.jpg
Sony record player on the left. Rotel RIAA in the middle. The small thing on the right is a Samson SD-card recorder recording at 96kHz/24bit.
I will provide a link to a FLAC download later to those who mail me a picture of themselves with the record. Cleavage or better will be prioritized. 
Mail: vonoben [ a ] gmail.com
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8582653/2011-05 ... .41.42.jpg
Sony record player on the left. Rotel RIAA in the middle. The small thing on the right is a Samson SD-card recorder recording at 96kHz/24bit.
I will provide a link to a FLAC download later to those who mail me a picture of themselves with the record.
Cleavage or better will be prioritized. Mail: vonoben [ a ] gmail.com
Posted: 10 May 2011, 19:07
That's the way I roll as well.VonOben wrote: Cleavage or better will be prioritized.
Posted: 10 May 2011, 19:20
A 96kHz 24bit FLAC sample (25Mbyte) of Marian can be downloaded if you right-click this link and use "save as".
It's about a minute long.
It's about a minute long.
Posted: 10 May 2011, 20:08
My ears might be stressed but I think it sounds slightly out of tune (pitched up) like if the record player rpm was a bit too fast - is that possible?
Posted: 10 May 2011, 20:10
Yes, it's possible. This is a new record player to me and this is the first time I'm using it. I'll check that.DocSommer wrote:My ears might be stressed but I think it sounds slightly out of tune (pitched up) like if the record player rpm was a bit too fast - is that possible?
Posted: 10 May 2011, 20:19
Doc! You're right. It does 104 revolutions in three minutes, it should do 100. Don't even know if that's adjustable on this player, perhaps I'll have to revert back to my Mitsubichi dp-200.
Nice ears, Doc!
Edit: Sound sample removed.
Edit#2: Needle pressure were WAY off aswell. The previous owner usually knows what he's doing, but maybe I have to reconsider that.
Nice ears, Doc!
Edit: Sound sample removed.
Edit#2: Needle pressure were WAY off aswell. The previous owner usually knows what he's doing, but maybe I have to reconsider that.
Posted: 10 May 2011, 20:32
I did some other comparisons with "marian" today, otherwise I probably wouldn't have noticed that^^
Posted: 11 May 2011, 21:39
i saw a FLAC download of the MOFI vinyl... might have checked it out, might not...
Posted: 12 May 2011, 00:53
Got mine today as well!
Posted: 12 May 2011, 04:18
Got mine today it's #1038 does that mean they started at #1000?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 06:47
'Fraid not. Mine is #145.
Posted: 12 May 2011, 09:27
Thanks for the heads updavedecay wrote:i saw a FLAC download of the MOFI vinyl... might have checked it out, might not...
Posted: 12 May 2011, 10:54
Oh it sounds gooooood.
Posted: 12 May 2011, 11:07
The title track appears to be the wrong version...
Sounds good though. Hmm
Edit: Anyone else have thoughts on the Mofi version of the title track? To my ears it sounds different to both '85 and '92 versions.
Sounds good though. Hmm
Edit: Anyone else have thoughts on the Mofi version of the title track? To my ears it sounds different to both '85 and '92 versions.