Page 4 of 4

Posted: 20 Sep 2005, 00:02
by Marsden Fields
Clucking Belle wrote:No you don't. In my three years on this forum, I would opine that most of you don't have a scooby. And although you think you do, provided that your hopelessly ill-informed prejudices and woefully argued views are kept to this forum then I won't lose any sleep over them.
and
RicheyJames wrote:
eastmidswhizzkid wrote:It was the fact that we have HL members who really think that the rest of us are all thick,crass, and downright stupid.
but the problem is that some of us actually are superior to the common herd. should we dumb down to fit in or use our gifts for the common good and try to raise the rest of you to a more enlightened world view?
Ah, I do love the smell of complete twats in the middle of the night. It makes me feel alive.

Posted: 20 Sep 2005, 01:26
by Johnny M
* cough * :roll:

Posted: 20 Sep 2005, 01:35
by Marsden Fields
My dear boy, a spot of peppermint tea should clear that cough right up.

Posted: 20 Sep 2005, 09:15
by canon docre
Marsden Fields wrote:
Clucking Belle wrote:No you don't. In my three years on this forum, I would opine that most of you don't have a scooby. And although you think you do, provided that your hopelessly ill-informed prejudices and woefully argued views are kept to this forum then I won't lose any sleep over them.
and
RicheyJames wrote:
eastmidswhizzkid wrote:It was the fact that we have HL members who really think that the rest of us are all thick,crass, and downright stupid.
but the problem is that some of us actually are superior to the common herd. should we dumb down to fit in or use our gifts for the common good and try to raise the rest of you to a more enlightened world view?
Ah, I do love the smell of complete twats in the middle of the night. It makes me feel alive.
At least one of the three quotes above wasn't meant entirely serious. :wink:

Posted: 20 Sep 2005, 09:45
by ruffers
You sure? :wink:

I'm enjoying this thread, more of the same please.

Posted: 20 Sep 2005, 14:11
by Marsden Fields
I'll certainly see what I can do, ruffers. I believe it's only a matter of time before someone else feels a burning desire to condemn ill-conceived prejudices simply because they don't agree with his or her own ill-conceived prejudices.

Posted: 20 Sep 2005, 15:26
by paint it black
I believe one too many commas MF?
I'll certainly see what I can do ruffers

This part of the thread was particularly funny, given that the English language is assembled almost entirely from paronyms
(such as the American mispelling of English)
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Relevant? Probably not

Next!

Posted: 20 Sep 2005, 15:55
by boudicca
Where's this tea then, I'm thirsty...

Posted: 20 Sep 2005, 23:21
by Rivers
Its just not good enough to say 'Saddam- fuckhead dictator'. He at least planned and err.......'executed' his ideas for Iraq which is more than can be said for the axis of good and oil need.
He also gave plenty of chances for his enemies to 'join' him. It was a simple choice- my way or electrodes on the testicles.
What did the Romans do for us? You know the rest.
Mussolini got the trains running on time didn't he? Not all bad then.
This Bush guy can't take the blame for anything can he?

Posted: 21 Sep 2005, 02:47
by Marsden Fields
paint it black wrote:I believe one too many commas MF?
No. It's grammatically correct both ways, but I prefer a more rhythmic style of writing, which generally includes a liberal sprinkling of commas. Otherwise, regarding the paronymous origins of the English language, you are absolutely correct. Bravo for being the sole rowboat of reason in this sea of self-righteous narrow-mindedness. Apart from myself, of course, but I like to think I'm more of an island.

John Donne be damned.

Posted: 21 Sep 2005, 07:42
by Dark
paint it black wrote:Next!
Doesn't James Blast have a copyright on that too?

Posted: 21 Sep 2005, 07:49
by lazarus corporation
paint it black wrote:This part of the thread was particularly funny, given that the English language is assembled almost entirely from paronyms
(such as the American mispelling of English)
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Relevant? Probably not
You're absolutely right - it's not relevant at all. But very useful as a distraction, I'm sure.

Posted: 21 Sep 2005, 09:00
by paint it black
Dark wrote:
paint it black wrote:Next!
Doesn't James Blast have a copyright on that too?
scott walker all the way i'm afraid. nice try though!

re:

Posted: 04 Oct 2005, 03:29
by Ocean Moves

Posted: 04 Oct 2005, 16:01
by James Blast
paint it black wrote:
Dark wrote:
paint it black wrote:Next!
Doesn't James Blast have a copyright on that too?
scott walker all the way i'm afraid. nice try though!
Jacques Brel, methinks

Re: re:

Posted: 05 Oct 2005, 00:11
by eastmidswhizzkid
Ocean Moves wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4306988.stm

do you want lies with that?
and hopefully this will be enough to finish her off :twisted: