Barcelona had a "bad voice day"...
Should May 2nd be marked as a "bad mix day" with an encore performance to make the world all silver gunmetal shiny again?
Please vote & discuss

Ayehellboy69 wrote:i agree (bloody Londoners hehehe), but suggesting might be acceptable?markfiend wrote:I think demanding a free show is probably counterproductive.
dtsom wrote:I wasn´t in Astoria show but I was In Barcelona and my opinion is:
in Barcelona Von had his voice damage as everyone know but the mayor problem was the crowd, people wanted to hear WAKE part 2,they don´t know that the sisters don´t have a human drummer YET, they think is playback... etc........
so the sisters wil play in barcelona and the crowd will be dissapointed other time(and i can say that the people there, are really angry and can be the free gig worst that the first one!!!)
so if in London was a bad sound night(i repeat that I don´t know because i wasn´t there) they deserve a free show more than Barcelona!!!
"a bit on the quiet side"Smallstone wrote:How about none of the above?
How about - No - tough. Average show that was a bit on the quiet side with someone falling asleep on the smoke machine.
It wasn't that bad (wasn't that good either) and I doubt anyone would see a marked improvement if they came and did another one. With or without a soundcheck.
Set list wasn't to my taste but you pays your money and you take your chances. I knew the risks before I took on the job. If he wants to play x amount of new songs that have yet to be released then it's his choice. I'm sure he's aware that each time he's played London it's in smaller and smaller venues.
From where I was standing (precariously, on the steps) I thought the concert was ok.czuczu wrote:Sound was bad but not Earth-shatteringly so, enough of the whinging and put your begging bowls away!
Wish I hadn't been able to hear them eitherGottdammerung wrote: I think Von was more than aware of the lack of sound..
When the crowd heckled him to get it turned up he replied "I can't hear you either.."
Pity that they could hear themselves ABOVE the band more like. I was having a coherent conversation down the front during the normally Very-Loud parts of certain songs. And, if the show had been comparable favourably overall to previous London shows, maybe people wouldn't have been saying 'The Last Time Was Better'.Mrs. Snowey wrote: Pity folk can't come to see a gig without explaining to their mates how much better the one they saw last time was.
No wonder there've been complaints that the sound was poor. Probably couldn't hear it above the sound of their own chit-chat.
I think you missed the point there. The last time I saw them was better, not because The Sisters have changed since then, but because the vocals, guitars, drums and bass were audible that time. If you're inferring that I may not like them because Ben and Robo are in the band instead of Some Other Largely Anonymous Shadows On Guitar you're woefully wrong. I've seen several lineups of the band in the past sixteen years (with Von as the only remaining member), and I couldn't care less who wields a Sisters guitar as long as they do a good job of it, which Ben and Robo clearly do.itnAklipse wrote:People have always been saying the last time was better. Why? Because the gits like their idea of the Sisters and what's in their own minds much more than the Sisters themselves, or anything else that goes outside of their own minds.
But this problem isn't related to the Sisters anymore than to any other (artistic) band, artistic movie director or anyone at all who doesn't manufacture a product for their fans.