Page 1 of 2
Mornington Crescent
Posted: 29 Jun 2003, 13:26
by Lars Svensson
As suggested by Zuma on the Where Do You Start thread...Wonder if this'll work..?
For those in the know, let's use the 1964 Standard European Rules (meaning the possible implementation of the
Takanawa-Suzuki Manoeuvre in certain circumstances, but disallowing the use of the outdated
Stakhanovite gambit)
For those not in the know, you'll soon pick it up!
OK, here goes...I'll start us off with...
ELEPHANT AND CASTLE...
Over to you!
Re: Mornington Crescent
Posted: 29 Jun 2003, 13:37
by Big Si
Lars Svensson wrote:As suggested by Zuma on the Where Do You Start thread...Wonder if this'll work..?
For those in the know, let's use the 1964 Standard European Rules (meaning the possible implementation of the
Takanawa-Suzuki Manoeuvre in certain circumstances, but disallowing the use of the outdated
Stakhanovite gambit)
For those not in the know, you'll soon pick it up!
OK, here goes...I'll start us off with...
ELEPHANT AND CASTLE...
Over to you!
Que
Re: Mornington Crescent
Posted: 29 Jun 2003, 13:52
by Big Si
Big Si wrote:Lars Svensson wrote:As suggested by Zuma on the Where Do You Start thread...Wonder if this'll work..?
For those in the know, let's use the 1964 Standard European Rules (meaning the possible implementation of the
Takanawa-Suzuki Manoeuvre in certain circumstances, but disallowing the use of the outdated
Stakhanovite gambit)
For those not in the know, you'll soon pick it up!
OK, here goes...I'll start us off with...
ELEPHANT AND CASTLE...
Over to you!
Que
http://www.dunx.org/mc/
Posted: 29 Jun 2003, 18:37
by Ed Rhombus
Bromley-by-Bow
Posted: 29 Jun 2003, 20:48
by Black Dahlia
As I believe I said on another thread recently .... You people REALLY need to get out more ............................
Posted: 29 Jun 2003, 23:50
by Lars Svensson
Black Dahlia wrote:As I believe I said on another thread recently .... You people REALLY need to get out more ............................
Too right B.D..!
HOWEVER, what an excellent opening from Mr Rhombus it has to be said...skilful, yet economic in its extravagance...
@ Ed, I counter with the controversial (yet hopefully acceptable under the Second Edition addendum)
Schmidt-Kessler strategy...
Thus (ooh, hope this works): BAYSWATER...
Over to the next one wishing to dabble their exploratory toe into this pool of excess...
Posted: 30 Jun 2003, 09:35
by Ed Rhombus
East Ham
Posted: 30 Jun 2003, 12:16
by Lars Svensson
aha! the game's afoot...
Ok....ummmmmmm...Liverpool Street!
Take that..!
Posted: 30 Jun 2003, 13:37
by Quiff Boy
based on your use of Liverpool Street, i invoke the 1979 Haile Selassie resolution, incororating the "free cheese on a monday afternoon" clause that was added in 1983 as a result of the uprising in Namibia during that year.
thus i counter with Becontree
Posted: 30 Jun 2003, 13:47
by Chairman Bux
For reasons far too obvious to detail here. I offer Higashi-zushi.
Just don't tell me you need an explanation - I thought we were dealing with professionals here.
Posted: 30 Jun 2003, 13:54
by Quiff Boy
Chairman Bux wrote:For reasons far too obvious to detail here. I offer Higashi-zushi.
Just don't tell me you need an explanation - I thought we were dealing with professionals here.
in which case, since the Coleman "Sauce" gambit of 1987 was ruled legal (thus vetoing the popular but still fledgling Nantwich "Bus Stop" move of 1986) a move such as "shirokane-takanawa" (on both the mita and nanboku lines of the tokyo subway) would be perfectly legitimate.
i think.
Posted: 30 Jun 2003, 14:00
by Lars Svensson
Ye gods...that came a bit like a kamikaze out of the sun...
Right...in line with the Richthoffen solution (the secondary and tertiary stages as played out in the classic 1907 game which has gone down in the annals of M.C history) I offer to the assembled throng...
Zagreb Central!
(And before anyone asks, yes this does conform to the basic European rules...take a look at the footnote on page 325 if you have any doubts - see!?!?)
Let's get this back on track...
I feel my victory is imminent...
Posted: 30 Jun 2003, 14:01
by Quiff Boy
Lars Svensson wrote:Ye gods...that came a bit like a kamikaze out of the sun...
Right...in line with the Richthoffen solution (the secondary and tertiary stages as played out in the classic 1907 game which has gone down in the annals of M.C history) I offer to the assembled throng...
Zagreb Central!
(And before anyone asks, yes this does conform to the basic European rules...take a look at the footnote on page 325 if you have any doubts - see!?!?)
Let's get this back on track...
I feel my victory is imminent...
touché!
but you see after such elaborate gamesmanship, a simple "salford crescent" could quite easily de-rail you... to continue the metaphore
Posted: 30 Jun 2003, 14:07
by Lars Svensson
It would be if it didn't contravene the ban on such a move instigated by the Paris Conference of 1876...shame though, it'd have been a good 'un otherwise...
Posted: 30 Jun 2003, 14:21
by Quiff Boy
aaargh! it's a fair cop. in which case the "Oslättfors" manoeuvre as first played at the infamous Free Beckenham Festival of 1969 allows me to counter with a move to "Bjärka Säby".
oh yes.
Posted: 30 Jun 2003, 14:31
by Chairman Bux
...which leads nicely on to Bahnhof Zoologischer Garten.
Posted: 30 Jun 2003, 15:13
by Zuma
ermmmm.....Bank
A Camden Corner Triple Play if ever I saw one...
Posted: 30 Jun 2003, 15:55
by Chairman Bux
Potsdamer Platz. I forget why.
Posted: 30 Jun 2003, 16:05
by Quiff Boy
Bricklayers Arms
not a station per se, but the "Chicken Kung-Po Gambit" (as first attempted in spring 1943 but not formally accepted until the autumn of 1962) that came out of the Ilkley and District Mornington Crescent Players Association Guild handbook 4th revision, makes it an acceptable move via Lewisham. and at least its in this country.
Posted: 30 Jun 2003, 16:10
by Lars Svensson
Another Controversial one this, but -
Edinburgh Waverley
Third Imperial Carolingian Rule works EVERY time!!!! Beat that mofos...
Posted: 30 Jun 2003, 16:12
by Quiff Boy
Posted: 30 Jun 2003, 16:17
by Thea
is it just me, or does tis thread look like a scrap between neil gaiman's "neverwhere" and robert rankin's entire back catalougue?
or is that just a subconious craving to read more...?
Posted: 30 Jun 2003, 16:46
by Zuma
who is in Nip?
As Waverley Station reverses the quadrants does it not?
Posted: 30 Jun 2003, 17:05
by Lars Svensson
reverses the quadrants on FOUR fronts methinks...that's the beauty of it...
there might be a way out by using the rarely-used Triple Pass Rule but it'd need a switchback up to Hell (in Norway) - dramatic, eh??
Myself, I'm not prepared to take the risk in case someone tries doing an Andersson on me...ooooh, noooooo...not for me...
Anybody else wanna have a go, be my guest...
PS @d00my...SUBCONIOUS? Wtf!!!!
Posted: 30 Jun 2003, 17:13
by Debaser
Lars Svensson wrote:reverses the quadrants on FOUR fronts methinks...that's the beauty of it...
there might be a way out by using the rarely-used Triple Pass Rule but it'd need a switchback up to Hell (in Norway) - dramatic, eh??
Myself, I'm not prepared to take the risk in case someone tries doing an Andersson on me...ooooh, noooooo...not for me...
Anybody else wanna have a go, be my guest...
PS @d00my...SUBCONIOUS? Wtf!!!!
Oh the 'be my guest' ploy
Can only end with 'Mornington Crescent'
Debaser