Page 1 of 3
m e g a upload is shafted
Posted: 19 Jan 2012, 22:43
by Pista
Maybe should be moved to the sharing section but MU has been shut down.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news ... rested.ars
Re: m e g a upload is shafted
Posted: 19 Jan 2012, 22:55
by Sita
Kim Dotcom?
But otherwise, yeah...
Posted: 19 Jan 2012, 23:10
by Being645
... bad news.
More info directly from
the FBI ...
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 00:14
by taylor
yes FBI
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 00:53
by Being645
Very bad.
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 01:44
by Dr Poo
Fucking Bastards Interfering.
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 08:01
by lachert
f**k
Re: m e g a upload is shafted
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 08:46
by Bartek
Kim Dotcom
That's why i couldn't watch whole streamed Top Gear Special Show last evening. Buffering stopped ~15 miunutes before end.
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 10:56
by markfiend
Money laundering? Racketeering? 20-year prison sentences?
Overreact much?
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 11:24
by Bartek
You can charge people for everything you want (genocide? extortion? anyone?), proving it's different story. But money laundering is possible, imho.
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 12:22
by Quiff Boy
just found this amusing quote on twitter:
Shutting down Megaupload because you can find illegal movies/music is like shutting down New York because you can find guns/drugs there
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 12:29
by Pista
Quiff Boy wrote:just found this amusing quote on twitter:
Shutting down Megaupload because you can find illegal movies/music is like shutting down New York because you can find guns/drugs there
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 13:11
by markfiend
Seen elsewhere:
"Everyone should take UMG and the FBI, etc, to small claims court. For all the people that lost legitimate things, you have a grievance. Do not think about class action, small claims cannot be represented by a lawyer, so they have to send an employee. They don't show up they lose. up to ($7000?...state?) imagine 10,000 filings across the country. Those of you that don't belong to Anonymous --> Use the LAWS to hurt them, like they use it to hurt US."
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 17:33
by DocSommer
So what will happen with rapidshare, netload, uploaded.to and all the other one click hosters?
Kim Schmitz has some kind of a history but his controversial "career" has nothing to to with the debate about one-click-hosters in general.
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 17:39
by Sita
I wasn't even aware Kim Dotcom was Kim Schmitz! I honestly thought they made a mistake in their press release. Don't know why but I have a soft spot for that guy.
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 17:49
by Pista
DocSommer wrote:So what will happen with rapidshare, netload, uploaded.to and all the other one click hosters?
Kim Schmitz has some kind of a history but his controversial "career" has nothing to to with the debate about one-click-hosters in general.
Good question.
Considering they pretty much all work the same way, I can only assume it's a matter of time before they are all nabbed too
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 18:01
by DocSommer
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 18:51
by Pista
or "Pishing" site even
Sharing sites...
Posted: 23 Jan 2012, 00:31
by DrG
Hello all. I just came across this article after having trouble with Filesonic...
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/filesonic ... dust/67670
It appears that Rapidshare is out, as well. Sad days for file sharing are ahead, especially for those in the US.
Posted: 23 Jan 2012, 01:26
by circle
Fileserve it's terminating suspect account like mine and T.U.B.E.s.
One click hosting is doomed.
Posted: 23 Jan 2012, 10:39
by Pista
circle wrote:Fileserve it's terminating suspect account like mine and T.U.B.E.s.
One click hosting is doomed.
This is a tragedy.
I was reading more about Dotcom. They had to cut through a panic room door to get to him
Posted: 23 Jan 2012, 11:40
by Bartek
i'm gonna suprise you- i read ACTA- i couldn't find nothing really new in this treaty, something resh and potentially danger in futire is provosions implying tight cooperation between entertaining comp./ RIAA likes organization, but be honest, it need to be done to procect copyright.
But all this attacks on megaupload, rapidshare because it contains copyright-breaking materials is a bit exagreration and breaking of presumption of innocence and Audiatur et altera pars rules. Shoting off pointed files that breaking laws is right, but turning off whole sites it's just finding easiest way/solution. Not to mention that on the same scheme they should turn off YT, VIMEO, Flickr, TUMBRL and etc. But whole this is bassed on US&A law what i dunno, so i'm not entitled to write/talkabout that.
Posted: 23 Jan 2012, 11:56
by Quiff Boy
in fairness, i've never downloaded anything
legal using megaupload or rapidshare
it was always a haven to knock-off music and software.
how long with did we think it was going to last?
there'll be another one along soon.
Posted: 23 Jan 2012, 12:05
by Pista
I agree on shutting down copyrighted stuff. Heck, we have artists on HL & I'm sure they'd agree that it's basically theft.
But the RIAA & UMG & Sony & even the Department For Homeland security are guilty.
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/everybody ... ents/65670
I wonder what the next move will be for all the one click hosting sites?
Posted: 23 Jan 2012, 12:09
by Bartek
i did this few(~ish) times but for me downloaded/stolen mp3s it just demo version, i listen to this 3 times, like- it's on my list to-buy and i but if i have money, don't like- bin.
last week this damn Belgians made me to buy my first digital album. i'm no longer affraid!