Page 1 of 1

You can never have enough shades....

Posted: 05 Jun 2004, 20:12
by Dave R
God damn, i used to do this myself in the late 80's early 90's....

You just HAD to carry a spare pair in case you lost/broke one.....

http://www.cgm.pl/2003_obraz_dzwiek/zdj ... 0ton01.jpg

The past was so bright.....i had to wear shades!!!

Posted: 05 Jun 2004, 21:18
by James Blast
nice pic Sir!

Posted: 06 Jun 2004, 16:02
by claws
In that picture he reminds me of Professor Farnsworth from the cartoon show "Futurama"

Posted: 07 Jun 2004, 09:31
by Dave R
Gonna get shot down in flames for this, but there is a hint of Tom Hanks in Philladelphia......

:innocent: :innocent: :innocent: :innocent: :innocent: :innocent: :innocent: :innocent:

Posted: 07 Jun 2004, 14:40
by markfiend
I wonder how many pairs of shades he actually owns/has owned?

And while we're on the subject of sunglasses, I've just ordered some of these. Clicky.

The top pair with the black lenses.

:innocent:

Posted: 07 Jun 2004, 19:56
by Silence is platinum
markfiend wrote:I wonder how many pairs of shades he actually owns/has owned?

And while we're on the subject of sunglasses, I've just ordered some of these. Clicky.

The top pair with the black lenses.

:innocent:

When "corrosion" was released he owned about 30 pairs according to
an interview at that time.
I m obsessed with the classic aviator rayban s :oops: :oops:

Posted: 08 Jun 2004, 12:49
by Thrash Harry
claws wrote:In that picture he reminds me of
... the oldest swinger in town.

Posted: 11 Jun 2004, 12:40
by Chairman Bux
Thrash Harry wrote:
claws wrote:In that picture he reminds me of
... the oldest swinger in town.
I dont know, have you seen Mr Hussey's picture lately?

Posted: 11 Jun 2004, 13:24
by straylight
Chairman Bux wrote:
Thrash Harry wrote:
claws wrote:In that picture he reminds me of
... the oldest swinger in town.
I dont know, have you seen Mr Hussey's picture lately?
Yes, but he's not allowed in town, or even past the crossroads except after dark is he?

Posted: 11 Jun 2004, 14:50
by Big Si
Thrash Harry wrote:
claws wrote:In that picture he reminds me of
... the oldest swinger in town.
That was my pal Big Malccy, but he got married just before xmas! :twisted:

Posted: 11 Jun 2004, 16:38
by Thrash Harry
Chairman Bux wrote:
Thrash Harry wrote:
claws wrote:In that picture he reminds me of
... the oldest swinger in town.
I dont know, have you seen Mr Hussey's picture lately?
But he always looked like the oldest swinger in town. Eldritch used to be cool personified. In that picture he looks like Eminem's dad.

Posted: 14 Jun 2004, 14:20
by straylight
Nah, he just looks like they turned the heating off.

He's never liked the cold you know.

Posted: 14 Jun 2004, 22:12
by Purple Light
A review of a gig a few years ago puts it perfectly...
"Eldritch looks more like a Dagenham ecstasy dealer these days"

Still, fair play to him, each to their own & all that. 8)

Posted: 15 Jun 2004, 05:02
by Thea
he still looks cool. in a "crazy old bloke that ate his buspass" way :? kinda.

Posted: 15 Jun 2004, 09:33
by The Green Lantern
That was well over a year ago. These days I predict it's bermudas and hawaiishirts all the way, or whatever hermites prefer.

I'd still want to see Von in a chalk-striped suit, with a ukulele.

Posted: 15 Jun 2004, 11:00
by Karst
Chairman Bux wrote:I dont know, have you seen Mr Hussey's picture lately?
Yup!

Note live setting and broken arm in full swing.

8)

Posted: 15 Jun 2004, 19:19
by James Blast
short hair comes to us all :(

Posted: 17 Jun 2004, 13:19
by markfiend
Bump. My sunglasses have come! Or should I say my Julbo glacier goggles
Image
The top pair. With the leather bridge-piece unfastened for added :von:
They're way cool. I'm as happy as a dog with two dicks.

Posted: 17 Jun 2004, 18:15
by EraserHead
Is it my eyesight, or has he got only one leg ?

Heck; keep me away from that Absinth please!

Posted: 18 Jun 2004, 11:13
by markfiend
EraserHead wrote:Is it my eyesight, or has he got only one leg ?

Heck; keep me away from that Absinth please!
*Edges away nervously*

Posted: 13 Jul 2004, 10:28
by Black Biscuit
The beanie resembles the type favoured by Public Enemy fans or homeless people in big American cities.

A closer look reveals the following: three lights used, all spots. (Good. Any more than three lights and it starts to get confusing.)

50mm lens at around /2.8 or thereabouts for limited depth of field.

Main light to Eldo's left, camera right. Spotted a little too tightly. Contrasty images are nice, but this one pushes the contrast limits of the film by half a stop, I'd say.

Another spot set up just out of sight in the back left of the picture (Eldo's right) shines a light onto the arm chair against the back wall. (Why all the spots?)

Then there's a backlight designed to blow highlights. It illuminates Eldo's epaulettes and the rim around the top of his beanie. Aimed from Andy's right towards his back and camera right.

Eldo has used the same facial expression in every photo since 1989. Dunno if he looks comfortable in this pic, but it's that same-y facial expression all the time that gets to me. Hard angular light (cross-lighting) brings out contrast - and detail in fabrics, too - but is a killer on all but the best skin.

Try softer light in the foreground (like a softbox for a very 'clean' and even light) and save the hard spotlights for the background only.

Place the softbox high - put it on a boom arm. This will leave Andy in a circle of soft light, lit from above.

The area behind him, all the way to the back wall, will then be dark - so bring in some spots for it. Think "less light, not more (always!)". Pools of light and shadow is a nice effect, but this photo is only partly successful in its result. A couple of tight spots (to partially illuminate key detail in the background but not make it overbearing) would be ideal.

But anyway, what were these people thinking? "Eldo in his reading room under a desk lamp with a broken heater thermostat" look? "Sunglasses indoors in winter?"

The fact that Eldo subtly hams-it-up in photos has not escaped my eagle eye, but this is the weirdest one of the lot. Sorry, guys.

Posted: 13 Jul 2004, 13:51
by Francis
Black Biscuit wrote:The beanie resembles the type favoured by Public Enemy fans or homeless people in big American cities.

A closer look reveals the following: three lights used, all spots. (Good. Any more than three lights and it starts to get confusing.)

50mm lens at around /2.8 or thereabouts for limited depth of field.

Main light to Eldo's left, camera right. Spotted a little too tightly. Contrasty images are nice, but this one pushes the contrast limits of the film by half a stop, I'd say.

Another spot set up just out of sight in the back left of the picture (Eldo's right) shines a light onto the arm chair against the back wall. (Why all the spots?)

Then there's a backlight designed to blow highlights. It illuminates Eldo's epaulettes and the rim around the top of his beanie. Aimed from Andy's right towards his back and camera right.

Eldo has used the same facial expression in every photo since 1989. Dunno if he looks comfortable in this pic, but it's that same-y facial expression all the time that gets to me. Hard angular light (cross-lighting) brings out contrast - and detail in fabrics, too - but is a killer on all but the best skin.

Try softer light in the foreground (like a softbox for a very 'clean' and even light) and save the hard spotlights for the background only.

Place the softbox high - put it on a boom arm. This will leave Andy in a circle of soft light, lit from above.

The area behind him, all the way to the back wall, will then be dark - so bring in some spots for it. Think "less light, not more (always!)". Pools of light and shadow is a nice effect, but this photo is only partly successful in its result. A couple of tight spots (to partially illuminate key detail in the background but not make it overbearing) would be ideal.

But anyway, what were these people thinking? "Eldo in his reading room under a desk lamp with a broken heater thermostat" look? "Sunglasses indoors in winter?"

The fact that Eldo subtly hams-it-up in photos has not escaped my eagle eye, but this is the weirdest one of the lot. Sorry, guys.
*Edges away nervously*

Posted: 14 Jul 2004, 00:59
by Black Biscuit
Francis wrote:
*Edges away nervously*
--- Good. I was planning on kicking your a--, anyway.

Posted: 14 Jul 2004, 09:31
by Francis
Black Biscuit wrote:--- Good. I was planning on kicking your a--, anyway.
:notworthy:

Tripods @ dawn then. :lol: