Page 1 of 1
A New TORCH lights the way...
Posted: 24 Jun 2005, 06:37
by shivarising
Just wanted to share a new Sisters cover of TORCH...
www.StrangeRebelFrequency.com
It's the 4th song on the list and can be downloaded. Any feedback much appreciated. Ta! 
Posted: 24 Jun 2005, 07:51
by hallucienate
Invalid Friend ID.
This user has either cancelled their membership, or their acccount has been deleted.
Posted: 24 Jun 2005, 13:00
by Izzy HaveMercy
hallucienate wrote:
Invalid Friend ID.
This user has either cancelled their membership, or their acccount has been deleted.
Idem.
IZ.
Posted: 24 Jun 2005, 19:26
by shivarising
Sorry bout that one. It's been sorted.
Posted: 24 Jun 2005, 20:18
by Karst
Sounds like Cathal Coughlan.
Posted: 25 Jun 2005, 06:25
by eastmidswhizzkid
to be brutally honest i hated it.
but then i havent heard a cover of the sisters that i do like.
Posted: 25 Jun 2005, 11:07
by christophe
if it wasn't a cover i might like it but this.....
Nope sorry.
Posted: 25 Jun 2005, 11:29
by Obviousman
Just wondering...
What's the reason you think you sound like godspeed or a silver mt. zion
Posted: 25 Jun 2005, 12:26
by _emma_
Sounds like someone needs a proper hobby.
Posted: 25 Jun 2005, 19:09
by Dark
Nice people.
Posted: 25 Jun 2005, 19:15
by Izzy HaveMercy
It's not my cup of tea either, but don't let that stop you making music
Otherwise, I should've stopped AGES ago...
IZ.
Posted: 25 Jun 2005, 19:15
by hallucienate
it's better than most covers of the sisters, but not as good as lambchop's
Posted: 25 Jun 2005, 19:19
by Obviousman
hallucienate wrote:it's better than most covers of the sisters, but not as good as lambchop's
Well, yeah, but lambchop's is (to me) the best cover of anything ever anyway... So, that would be a bit hard, isn't it
...
Posted: 25 Jun 2005, 19:34
by nick the stripper
It's good, but it doesn't have the same ambient atmosphere I get from the original version.
Why did you cut out the woodwind solo? That was my favourite part of the original song, it hits me in the back of the neck every time.
Posted: 25 Jun 2005, 19:38
by hallucienate
Obviousman wrote:hallucienate wrote:it's better than most covers of the sisters, but not as good as lambchop's
Well, yeah, but lambchop's is (to me) the best cover of anything ever anyway... So, that would be a bit hard, isn't it
...
Dunno about the best cover of anything ever, but it's up there yes
Posted: 27 Jun 2005, 01:20
by pikkrong
Sorry! an unexpected error has occurred was all I got
Posted: 27 Jun 2005, 01:22
by pikkrong
Since I couldn't hear this song I can only talk about Lambchop's cover. Which is great indeed, no doubt. Today I surprised someone with this song and he said the same.
Posted: 27 Jun 2005, 06:26
by EricSweden
i'm not a fan of the original but your cover was NOT too bad actually.
my favorite covered sisters song is lucretia by dan swanö.
it's raw and heavy. and his voice sounds pretty good too.
Posted: 27 Jun 2005, 10:18
by MrChris
I liked the guitars. I quite liked the voice, judging from the other tracks anyway, but not so much on this track for some reason. The backing vocals on All Souls Rising were very nice, though, and would sound interesting on Torch too.
Posted: 28 Jun 2005, 08:47
by Ed Rhombus
Quiffy, time for you to explain Sisters fans and Sisters covers again.
You did it so well last time
Posted: 28 Jun 2005, 11:34
by ruffers
To be honest I didn't like it much.
Sorry.
I like covers which do something to the tune rather than essentially recreate it just by different people. S Club Seven's Don't Stop Moving was magnificently covered by The Beautiful South, Emma by some band or other etc, this version of Torch doesn't move me.
Rock it up!
Posted: 07 Jul 2005, 08:09
by claws
I don't like the original, and this cover is slightly worse
